Studyspark Study Document

U.S. War in Iraq Ever Essay

Pages:2 (799 words)

Sources:4

Subject:Government

Topic:War On Terror

Document Type:Essay

Document:#83414686


The terrorists responsible for 9/11 were not Iraqi

. The only reason for entering Iraq was the fact that there was a significant Al Qaeda base. The Iraqis themselves are the victims of their position amid the violence. In effect, they are paying for hostility and a war that is not theirs and that they have no involvement in. Perpetuating a war like this in a country that is essentially innocent is a gross violation not only of human rights, but also of ethics in general.

In conclusion, the worst part of the war in Iraq is probably its duration. Despite increasing public calls for a stop to the lack of ethical footing surrounding the war in Iraq, the American presence in the country has been ongoing for more than a decade under the premise of maintaining order and security

. However, since the start of the war, and even now, at this late stage, little of this peace and security is evident. Violence and chaos appear to be at the order of the day, sometimes perpetuated by the very troops who are to keep the peace. Sadly, Iraq is a victim of its circumstances and at the mercy of the decisions of powerful men craving ever more power. The human rights violations, lack of WMDs, and no involvement in the war demonstrate beyond all doubt that the war is unethical now as when it first started.

References

Cowan, Steven B. "The Ethics of War and the War in Iraq." Apologetics Resource Center. 9 November 2005. http://www.arcapologetics.org/articles/article04.htm 19 March 2012.

Rane, M.A. "The Iraq War -- the first Unlawful and Unethical War of the Third Millennium." International Humanist and Ethical Union, 4 November 2004. http://www.iheu.org/node/1177 19 March 2012.

M.A. Rane. "The Iraq War -- the first Unlawful and Unethical War of the Third Millennium." International Humanist and Ethical Union, 4 November 2004. http://www.iheu.org/node/1177 (19 March 2012).

Steven B. Cowan. "The Ethics of War and the War in Iraq." Apologetics Resource Center. 9 November 2005. http://www.arcapologetics.org/articles/article04.htm (19 March 2012).

M.A. Rane. "The Iraq War -- the first Unlawful and Unethical War of the Third Millennium." International Humanist and Ethical Union, 4 November 2004. http://www.iheu.org/node/1177 (19 March 2012).

Steven B. Cowan. "The Ethics of War and the War in Iraq." Apologetics Resource Center. 9 November 2005. http://www.arcapologetics.org/articles/article04.htm (19 March 2012).


Sample Source(s) Used

References

Cowan, Steven B. "The Ethics of War and the War in Iraq." Apologetics Resource Center. 9 November 2005. http://www.arcapologetics.org/articles/article04.htm 19 March 2012.

Rane, M.A. "The Iraq War -- the first Unlawful and Unethical War of the Third Millennium." International Humanist and Ethical Union, 4 November 2004. http://www.iheu.org/node/1177 19 March 2012.

M.A. Rane. "The Iraq War -- the first Unlawful and Unethical War of the Third Millennium." International Humanist and Ethical Union, 4 November 2004. http://www.iheu.org/node/1177 (19 March 2012).

Steven B. Cowan. "The Ethics of War and the War in Iraq." Apologetics Resource Center. 9 November 2005. http://www.arcapologetics.org/articles/article04.htm (19 March 2012).

Cite this Document

Join thousands of other students and "spark your studies."

Sign Up for FREE
Related Documents

Studyspark Study Document

U.S. War in Iraq No

Pages: 2 (665 words) Sources: 2 Subject: Military Document: #67918799

S. companies were anticipating (Meyer 2010). There have been very few oil profits from this war, which is another reason why the U.S. should not have gotten involved in it. Moreover, the U.S. should not have gotten involved in the war in Iraq for the simple fact that the former committed several immoral acts during this armed conflict. While one of the initial reasons for U.S. involvement in this belligerence was

Studyspark Study Document

U.S. War on Terrorism the

Pages: 5 (1450 words) Subject: History - Israel Document: #80030692

Even governments who supported the use of force, most notably Britain, did not support the regime change." Motivating U.S. position, author Robert J. Lieber justifies the preemptive and preventive use of force by the American policymakers: "militant Islamic terrorism plus weapons of mass destruction pose a threat and require us to alter the way we think about the preemptive and even preventive use of force." Supporting the human rights argument

Studyspark Study Document

U.S. in Iraq Argumentative Essay:

Pages: 10 (2999 words) Sources: 6 Subject: Military Document: #16273629

The American administration was well aware of the genocidal massacre of the Tutsi by their Hutu neighbors that accounted for more than a million innocent victims killed, mostly by machetes that would have posed less of a problem to U.S. forces had they been deployed to stop the carnage in Rwanda. Similar atrocities, albeit less in number, have been ongoing in Sudan and especially in Darfur since before Operation Iraqi

Studyspark Study Document

U.S. Foreign Policy: Pre and

Pages: 10 (4171 words) Sources: 1+ Subject: American History Document: #95331019

A long passage is quoted here by way of showing what all these various writers are concerned about: (Kane, 2003)May 2002 brought the odd spectacle of ex-President Jimmy Carter standing shoulder to shoulder in Havana with one of the U.S. government's oldest enemies, Cuban president Fidel Castro. Carter, on a mission to convey a message of friendship to the Cuban people and to seek some common ground between Cuba

Studyspark Study Document

U.S. Capability to Support Two

Pages: 4 (1658 words) Sources: 3 Subject: Military Document: #76669849

Moreover, the lack of support from the American public brings to fore an issue raised by Grover (3) with the deployment of U.S. military personnel in various parts of the world. As many of these deployments have "the potential for violent conflict," this calls for "the need to respond quickly and decisively," which is hinged on the "unambiguous support of the American people." There is no other U.S. president

Studyspark Study Document

U.S. Approach to Terrorism Post 2001

Pages: 10 (3011 words) Sources: 4 Subject: Terrorism Document: #86839720

U.S. Approach to Terrorism U.S Approach to Terrorism Post 2001 The incidence of September 11, 2001 led to an anti-terrorism campaign by the government of U.S. And was called the war or terror. Since 2001, U.S. government has taken several steps to maintain security and counter terrorism by implementing certain strategies at national and international level. These approaches and steps, whether useful or not have been discussed in this paper. President Bush's Justifications

Join thousands of other students and

"spark your studies".