Morality of Genetic Testing Although Case Study

In this case, Harry also has no moral obligation to receive genetic testing. Although another argument would state that Harry is morally required to disclose to his wife that she may have to deal with the monumental task of caring for a person with Huntington's disease before they are married, Harry and his fiancee are both consenting adults. If she does not demand to know, she cannot hold him responsible in the future. Where Harry does become responsible for getting the genetic testing is when his future children are considered. Harry is morally required to determine whether he will not only be unable to care for his children because of an early struggle with the disease and death, but also whether or not he will pass the disease along to them. If Harry does not get the testing, he subjects his unborn children to the possibility of a life of pain and suffering both emotionally and physically. The unborn children cannot make a decision as to whether they would be willing to deal with such a circumstance. Thus, Harry is morally required to get the test if he is considering having children. Further, he is morally required to prevent having children if he is found to be carrying the gene. Opponents to this argument would suggest that the decision to have children is left up to Harry and his fiancee alone. However, this is not moral because it involves the life of another who will be able to feel emotional and physical pain.

Thus, Harry and his fiance have several options to deal with this circumstance. Harry can choose to get the test, and if not carrying the gene, he can proceed to start a family. Harry can choose to get the test, and if carrying the gene, can refrain from having children. Finally, Harry can refrain from getting the test, but he must also refrain from…