Tenure refers to a legally secure position, an “indefinite appointment” at an institute of higher learning (AAUP, 2019, p. 1). Of course, extenuating circumstances may enable the educational institution to sever the contract and terminate the tenured faculty. One of those extenuating circumstances would be financial exigency: an unavoidable and unfortunate situation in which the institution experiences severe budget shortfalls and must completely reconsider reallocating resources in order to remain viable at all. A similar extenuating circumstance that may legally permit the termination of a tenured faculty member would be the restructuring of the institution to the degree that whole departments were eliminated, thus eliminating all associated faculty within that department. Other extenuating circumstances that would legally permit the institution to terminate tenured faculty would be serious legal or ethical violations. Otherwise, though, tenured faculty enjoy greater job security and benefits versus their non-tenured colleagues.
According to the American Association of University Professors (AAUP, 2019), tenure has been embedded in higher educational policy since 1940. Tenure has remained the cornerstone of higher education, promoting broader values related to academic freedom and freedom of speech (Eastman & Boyles, 2015). As Curnalia & Mermer (2018) point out, “tenure makes it safe for faculty to try new pedagogies and explore new lines of research; formal academic freedom protects faculty who advocate on behalf of their students, their universities, and their communities,” (p. 129). Although critics of the tenure system point out that the vast majority of university and college faculty do not enjoy the protections of tenure including its attendant academic freedoms and job security, tenure remains a critical component in protecting the integrity of higher education.
However, the means by which to protect academic freedom and ensure labor rights could be currently under threat. The vast majority—70%--of all faculty appointments are currently not on the tenure track at all (Curnalia & Mermer, 2018). University administrators face mounting pressure to keep their institutions financially viable, which further undermines their ability to expand opportunities for tenure. Conflicts of interest have also plagued university administrators attempting to balance the need for remaining financially solvent with their commitments to ideals like academic freedom.
Preserving Institutional Rights
Lofty ideals like academic freedom need not always conflict with institutional rights to manage financial exigencies, but often do. Administrators will occasionally face uncomfortable or compromising situations involving decisions such as whether or how to terminate tenured faculty for financial reasons. In situations like these, tenured faculty have some legal rights such as due process. Part-time and untenured faculty do not enjoy the same legal rights, and may not even be entitled to collective bargaining. An increasing number of faculty members are hired on a contract or contingency basis.
Organizational culture has become a significant issue related to faculty rights. Faculty, particularly tenured faculty, have a vested interest in shared governance models of organizational structure (Curnalia & Mermer, 2018). Shared governance implies that…
…and to collective bargaining.
The Collective Bargaining Process
Integral to the exercise of labor rights, collective bargaining is a process by which administrators and faculty negotiate terms with the ideal outcome of a win-win situation. As with shared models of governance in academic institutions, collective bargaining implies the equal legal status of all parties. According to the AAUP (2019), collective bargaining remains far more common and accessible in state funded educational institutions due in part to landmark legislation that seriously undermined faculty rights in the United States: National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) v. Yeshiva University. This landmark case resulted in a dramatic decline in the power conferred to faculty, which were subsequently treated as subordinate members of the organization vis-a-vis administrators (AAUP, 2019). The impact has been to antagonize faculty and administrators, creating an even greater need for collective bargaining to minimize the chances of abusing the right to declare financial exigency in order to silence staff or terminate a tenure contract.
Organizations like the AAUP and also labor unions continue to represent and advocate on behalf of all faculty, including part-time and contingent faculty. Institutions of higher learning are fundamental features of any democracy. The advancement of research does depend on strong and fiscally wise management, but decisions made by administrators should never place profitability over the values inherent in higher education. Faced with financial exigency, universities and colleges have a wide range of options. Solutions can be reached more efficiently and…
Sample Source(s) Used
References
Alleman, N.F. & Haviland, D. (2017). “I expect to be engaged as an equal”: collegiality expectations of full-time, non-tenure-track faculty members. High Educ (2017) 74: 527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0062-4
American Association of University Professors (AAUP 2019). Tenure. Retrieved from: https://www.aaup.org/issues/tenure
Curnalia, R. M. L., & Mermer, D. (2018). Renewing our commitment to tenure, academic freedom, and shared governance to navigate challenges in higher education. Review of Communication, 18(2), 129–139.doi:10.1080/15358593.2018.1438645
Eastman, N. J., & Boyles, D. (2015). In defense of academic freedom and faculty governance: John Dewey, the 100th anniversary of the AAUP, and the Threat of Corporatization
Mitchell, M., Palacios, V. & Leachman, M. (2015). States are still funding higher education below pre-recession levels. Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy, April 2015, Article 71. Retrieved from: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1524&context=jcba
Related Documents
Study Document
Education Higher Education Law Overall
State regulations prohibit discrimination on the basis of explicit protected categories, including age, in any program or activity that is funded directly by the state, or receives any financial assistance from the state (Black, 2002). The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and the federal implementing regulations at 34 Code of Federal Regulations part 110, prohibit discrimination based on age in programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance. All California
Study Document
Higher Education Policy in the USA and the UK
Quality" Policy in higher education in the U.S.A. and the UK As a country, we need more citizens who are college graduates. We need their help for rebuilding the nation's economy for a global age, to make our democracy stronger, to empower millions of the citizens. Even in this contentious and divisive times, harmony is building at that instance. Labor personnel employers, social scientists, researchers, together with Washington policy makers
Study Document
The Development and Future of Higher Education
Introduction Higher education curriculum and practice responds to cultural, historical, political, and social events. Moreover, the curriculum in higher education institutions is purpose-driven, reflecting the educational theories and philosophies that guide the school’s mission and vision. Some institutions of higher learning aim for a competency-based curriculum, while others develop more subject-oriented or liberal arts-based curricula. Private and public schools may also respond differently to external or environmental pressures and influences. Whereas
Study Document
Equity in Higher Education
Access and Equity of Higher Education by the Population Policy Analysis Memo Draft Format guidelines Equity in higher education is a serious concern as the cost of tuition continues to increase. The cost of college tuition has increased by over 150% in the last three decades. Current financial pressure on students leads them to using student loans as a method to pay for college tuition or other strategies such as opting
Study Document
Education 520 Business Law
Education Law Education 520 Business Law Hiring policy To avoid an anti-discriminatory lawsuit regarding hiring practices, an employer should declare him or herself an 'equal opportunity employer.' To be compliant with the laws enforced by the EEOC, an employer must not discriminate based upon race, color, religion, national origin, or sex. The employer should also not discriminate on the basis of pregnancy, age, disability or genetic information (Laws enforced by the EEOC, 2012,
Study Document
Post Tenure The Perceptions of
" (Zemsky, 1)
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis of the research endeavor is that online professors will report no perceptible connection between post-tenure review and job performance.
Alternate Hypothesis
The alternate hypothesis of the research endeavor is that online professors will report that post-tenure review improves job performance.
Nature of the Study
Significance of the Study
The significance of the proposed research is based in the need for greater study