Study Document
Decision Making: Individual Vs. Group Essay
Pages:2 (754 words)
Sources:2
Subject:Personal Issues
Topic:Decision Making
Document Type:Essay
Document:#83591887
To this end, synergy can be likened to economies of scope, whereby the quality of decisions reached goes up with the inclusion of more minds (Nelson & Quick, 2012). Information-sharing is based on the idea that every individual possesses some unique information besides that which is known by everyone (Nelson & Quick, 2012). When several individuals come together in a group, they consolidate these unique pieces of information, creating a more complete informational platform and consequently, a decision of high quality (Nelson & Quick, 2012).
Group decision making is not without its share of drawbacks; i) since the technique is built on consultations, it usually involves lengthy procedures that could be quite costly to the organization, ii) it could kill team spirit, especially if some members feel that they are being shortchanged, iii) decisions are largely influenced by members' relative statuses - in an academic group task, for instance, members could adopt an option just because it has been voiced by the smartest member and, iii) groupthink could develop, especially if effective consensus-determination conditions have not been established (Nelson & Quick, 2012).
Individual Decision Making: the advantages of individual decisions include; i) the process is fast and consumes less time and resources, ii) it allows individuals to think for themselves and, iii) there is a deeper sense of accountability and responsibility (Nelson & Quick, 2012).
The disadvantages are that; there is limited room for synergy, and that information-sharing is restricted, and there is a very negligible (or no chance at all) of one learning new information (Nelson & Quick, 2012).
The issue of time still remains quite controversial, especially after empirical research indicated that individuals do not reach their decisions any faster than groups do (Band & Partridge, 2001). This only means that a lot is still unclear in the group vs. individual decision making debate and that there is need for more research.
References
Band, J. & Partridge, L. (2001). Advanced Decision Making. Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire: Select Knowledge Ltd.
Bazerman, M.H. & Don, a.M. (2008). Judgment in Managerial Decision-Making (7th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Nelson, D. & Quick, J. (2012). Organizational…
Sample Source(s) Used
References
Band, J. & Partridge, L. (2001). Advanced Decision Making. Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire: Select Knowledge Ltd.
Bazerman, M.H. & Don, a.M. (2008). Judgment in Managerial Decision-Making (7th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Nelson, D. & Quick, J. (2012). Organizational Behavior: Science, the Real World, and You (8th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Related Documents
Study Document
Decision-Making Critical Review Vroom, V.H.,
The two scenarios are likely to sway employees to provide false information if they are encouraged. However, the relationship had much strength in the positive. Therefore, in this study, there were clear choices. The participants were required to either tell the truth or lie. If things were easy for individuals in the world, lines of making moral decisions tend to be much fuzzier, however, the bottom line remains the same
Study Document
Decision Making and Accounting Theories Business Owners
Decision Making and Accounting Theories Business owners find that they always have to put on business hats when they are starting up or managing their businesses. However in business it is not the owners who are meant to make decisions only, decisions can also be made by employees. When classification of business decisions is done it is on the basis of how predictable that particular decision is. Programmed decisions are those
Study Document
Decision-Making: What Are the Newest
The dominant, goal-oriented person can focus on the ultimate objective, the influence-based person can examine the interpersonal dynamics of the decisions that must be made, the steady person can foster harmony and a positive atmosphere, and the conscientious person can stay on task in a reliable fashion. While clashing personalities can thwart reaching positive and goal-directed solutions, they can create a better solution and check the excesses of one
Study Document
Decision-Making Styles
Decision Making Styles Leadership is the position of authority in which it is possible to provide guidance or direction through making decisions that will affect other people. There are many methods of decision making, and each individual person has a unique decision making style. Many different studies have explored the vast and quite possibly infinite numbers of decision making styles that are exhibited by people. One example of such personality studies is
Study Document
Decision Making Decision-Making: The Applicability
Not even the most brilliant, ethical, and rational person has the ability to research every conceivable implication and alternative before making every decision in life. Group decision-making is another method of decision-making, where the decision is often arrived at by consensus or committee, such as coming to a decision as to where to take a family vacation. The decision is often time-consuming, because ideally it must please everyone, although quite
Study Document
Decision Making and Organizational Culture Speech What
Decision Making and Organizational Culture Speech What is organizational culture? Basically, just like any culture, the organizational culture of a business or a nonprofit is the personality of the organization. Some personality types of organizational cultures has been identified as that of an "academy culture," where employees are highly skilled and tend to stay in the organization, while working their way up the ranks. In contrast, a "baseball team" type of