Studyspark Study Document

Supreme Court and Court Essay

Pages:4 (1377 words)

Sources:1+

Document Type:Essay

Document:#85168299


Cannibal Cop" -- When does evil thought become a crime?

Gilbert Valle III was a 28-year-old former New York City police officer who was arrested after his wife reveled to authorities that he was obsessed with the idea of kidnapping women, torturing them, raping them then eating their flesh.

His wife had come upon his computer record of his visits to chat rooms (including "Dark Fetish Net") that deal in unspeakably evil activities. She saw that he had fantasized kidnapping women -- perhaps as many as 100 -- tying them up, raping them, torturing them, then butchering them and cooking them in the oven, after which he saw himself eating them.

He had what is called a "bondage fetish," among other fetishes, but all his planning, which consisted of Google searches for how to make chloroform, how to kidnap women and more, never actually materialized into real life actions. In other words, yes, he was originally convicted of conspiracy to commit kidnapping and he was convicted of illegally accessing the federal National Crime Information Center database. In that database he was apparently searching for potential female targets that he could kidnap and eventually eat.

This was clearly among the more bizarre crimes in New York City. Or was it really a crime? Valle was found guilty with conspiracy to commit kidnapping in 2013 in Manhattan Federal Court (the Thurgood Marshall Court House). A jury of six women and six men found him guilty. He served 21 months in prison. But a Federal District Court judge overturned his conviction; there was insufficient evidence that he really planned to commit a kidnapping crime.

Exclusive Interview with Valle

Me: What brought you to the point where you were actually planning to kill your own wife, slice her throat, tie her up, torture her and then cook her and eat her?

Valle: There are a lot of myths about what was actually going on.

Me: Well, what was actually going on?

Valle: Once you have that initial picture in your head, the initial concept of what you might like to do, you start to seek out pieces of information that go with those pictures in your head . . .

Me: An FBI forensics specialist testified in the trial that among the twisted searches you launched on your computer, you tried to locate "recipes for human flesh." You were seriously planning these ugly, unthinkable crimes, right? By the way, did you find any recipes?

Valle: Honestly I can't recall if I did or not.

Me: But here you are in a Federal Court having to listen to evidence that surely the jurors are shocked by. You were seriously planning to kidnap and barbecue the women who testified in court, right? Even if you, in your heart of hearts, didn't really plan to do that, it looks awful.

Valle: I want everyone to have all the facts before they make up their minds. I was born in Queens, New York. My parents separated when I was young. I graduated from the University of Maryland in 2006 with a degree in psychology. I never harmed anyone. Never.

Interview with Lead Defense Attorney for Valle, Julie Gatto

Gatto: The defense team has always maintained that his time in those chat rooms was just a trip into fantasy land, that he may have had some hideous thoughts and made contacts with individuals that were psychologically unfit, but he never carried out any of those plans.

Me: We're talking about atrocities against women, including his wife. She testified that she was "Supposed to be tied by my feet, my throat slit, and they were going to watch the blood rush from my body." As a woman, did you have a tough time defending a person who could conjure up such hideously cruel strategies against women -- including eating them?

Gatto: I was able filter those unpleasant aspects…


Sample Source(s) Used

Works Cited

CNBC. (2017). Politics: US appeals court upholds suspension of Trump travel ban. Retrieved February 11, 2016, from http://www.cnbc.com.

Gearty, R., and Gregorian, D. (2013). 'Cannibal Cop's' wife testifies on NYPD officer's sick bondage fetish. New York Daily News. Retrieved February 11, 2017, from http://www.nydailynews.com.

Findlaw.com. (2015). Federal vs. State Courts -- Key Differences. Retrieved February 11, 2017,

from http://www.litigation.findlaw.com.

Cite this Document

Join thousands of other students and "spark your studies."

Sign Up for FREE
Related Documents

Studyspark Study Document

Supreme Court and Public Opinion the Supreme

Pages: 4 (1479 words) Sources: 3 Subject: Business - Law Document: #42639308

Supreme Court and Public Opinion The Supreme Court of the United States was established in 1789 as part of the basic three sections of the American governmental system: Executive (President and Staff), Legislative (Congress), and Judicial (Supreme Court System). Each U.S. State also has a supreme court, which is the highest law for interpreting cases that move into that jurisdiction. Essentially, the Supreme Court has the ultimate jurisdiction over all federal

Studyspark Study Document

Supreme Court Case: According to

Pages: 3 (1051 words) Sources: 6 Subject: Criminal Justice Document: #76650881

While the decision has hung over states as one national standard, it infringes the essential principles of federalism and separation of powers that are rooted in the country's constitutional system (Silversten, 2011). During the time that the Supreme Court made this ruling, the state of Georgia basically had the same position on punishment for the crime of rape with many states. Actually, very few states permitted the executions or enforcement

Studyspark Study Document

Supreme Court Case Supreme Court Decision in

Pages: 3 (1015 words) Sources: 3 Subject: Business - Law Document: #88995821

Supreme Court Case Supreme Court Decision in Re Waterman, 910 2D (N.H. 2006) The Case The case addressed in this section of the report is that of Supreme Court case In Re Waterman, 910 A.2d 1175 (N.H. 2006). In this case, Tracy Waterman, working as a trooper for the New Hampshire State Policy was informed on August 29, 3003 that Vicky Lemere, the wife of one of Waterman's fellow troopers, informed Lieutenant Nedeau,

Studyspark Study Document

Supreme Court Cases Muller V. Oregon Women's

Pages: 5 (1601 words) Sources: 5 Subject: Business - Law Document: #41142152

Supreme Court cases (Muller V. Oregon) women's right Why it was an issue of national importance The Muller v. Oregon case was among the most crucial Supreme Court cases in the U.S. during the progressive regime. The case held an Oregon law that limited the working days for female wage employees to a maximum of ten hours. In 1908, this case created a precedent to expand access of national activities into the

Studyspark Study Document

Supreme Court of Mississippi Cash Distributing Company, Inc. V. James Neely...

Pages: 3 (875 words) Sources: 3 Subject: Business - Law Document: #46726236

Supreme Court of Mississippi. CASH DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. v. James NEELY. Facts In 1973, James Neely started working for Cash Distributing Co., a company that distributed Anheuser-Busch products in several parts of the United States. The company had offices in Columbus, Starkville and Tupelo. During the 1990s, James Neely was heading the Columbus office. By this time, Anheuser-Busch started to look more closely at the way some of its rules were enforced,

Studyspark Study Document

Supreme Court Case

Pages: 2 (907 words) Sources: 1 Subject: Business - Law Document: #93112967

Supreme Court Case The Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was an extremely important one, and one which set a significant precedent in the United States that would not be overturned until the Brown v. Board of Education decision in the middle of the 20th century. The former case set the precedent for what was known as the separate but equal doctrine. The principle question considered in this case was

Join thousands of other students and

"spark your studies".