Studyspark Study Document

Juvenile Probation Programs: A Comparison/Contrast Term Paper

Pages:5 (1428 words)

Sources:1+

Subject:Government

Topic:Juvenile Probation

Document Type:Term Paper

Document:#98929942


" But unlike Lehigh County, Cook County, on its website, provides a mission statement consisting of the aim to recognize the welfare of all children and their families based on public safety; it also is committed to "providing the guidance, structure and services needed by every child under its supervision" (2005, Internet). Thus, both of these juvenile probation departments have very similar goals, namely, to protect society from repeat offenders while providing equal and fair justice to the offenders, due to their age and, at times, negative social positions.

Eight specific objectives are also included in this mission statement -- to meet the special needs of each offender; to provide services to the community via sending probation officers into homes, schools and neighborhoods; to create strong relationships between probation officers and minors; to recognize the complexities of today's world and help parents to relate to their children in positive ways; to serve the needs of the minor offender while also maintaining the needs of the community; to use flexible supervision of offenders, either at home or in detention; to strengthen family relationships, and lastly, to "instill in all children a sense of responsibility for their actions and a belief in their own innate value and potential through a combination of individualized attention and community networking" (2005, Internet).

And like Lehigh County, Cook County has developed a number of innovative programs to combat juvenile crime; some of these programs have received much recognition from judges, probation officers, police organizations and community-based help organizations created to assist juveniles in a very complex and confusing world. Eight specific programs are listed on the Cook County website -- first, Station Adjustment Collaboration which makes it possible for all Youth Divisions within the Chicago Police Department to work together for delinquency prevention and intervention; the Community Liaison Program which identifies "local delinquency issues" and facilitates "community participation in a variety of programs;" the Diversion Compliance Program which interlinks the Cook County attorneys and probation officers; the Choices Program, a type of screening conference that offers advice on peer pressure related to drugs, alcohol, gang violence and the impact of one's actions on the community; the Violence Intervention Program, an educational system to inform offenders about gun violence and the victims of their offenses; the Victim Impact Panels for Minors, similar in nature to a mandatory course on the dangers of drunken driving; the Jump Start Program which gives young offenders a new head start in life after committing their crimes and serving time in jail, and finally, the Victim Advocacy Program whose goal is to "help reduce the immediate and long-term impact of being a victim while promoting the accountability of the offender" (2005, Internet).

Conclusion:

The successes and failures of these two prominent programs is difficult to determine, mostly because the individual websites do not offer any statistics as to success or failure of their specific programs. However, it is clear that any juvenile probation program, no matter how intricate or complex, contains aspects for failure, due to the overall nature of juvenile crime and its impact on society. Both of these programs appear to be highly effective in eliminating or deterring juvenile crime, no doubt as a result of their national recognition for true achievement in this subject. As to improving these programs, a dose of good, old-fashioned reality in the form of harsh imprisonment and the so-called "tough love" approach would surely help to minimize juvenile crime by showing exactly how brutal and callous reality can sometimes be, especially in the life of a young offender who, in most cases, must be forced to confront his/her own mortality and have some remorse for their illegal actions against society.

REFERENCES

"Court of Common Pleas -- Lehigh County, Pennsylvania." (2005). Juvenile Probation Department. Internet. 2005. Accessed August 30, 2005. http://www.

lccpa.org/depts/juvenilepro/juvenileprograms.html#13.

"Court Programs -- Juvenile Probation & Court Services -- Cook County, IL."

(2005). Internet. Accessed August 30, 2005. http://www.cookcountycourt.org/services/


Sample Source(s) Used

REFERENCES

"Court of Common Pleas -- Lehigh County, Pennsylvania." (2005). Juvenile Probation Department. Internet. 2005. Accessed August 30, 2005. http://www.

lccpa.org/depts/juvenilepro/juvenileprograms.html#13.

"Court Programs -- Juvenile Probation & Court Services -- Cook County, IL."

(2005). Internet. Accessed August 30, 2005. http://www.cookcountycourt.org/services/

Cite this Document

Join thousands of other students and "spark your studies."

Sign Up for FREE
Related Documents

Studyspark Study Document

Juvenile Offenders and Juvenile

Pages: 10 (12874 words) Sources: 1+ Subject: Criminal Justice Document: #40811758

Dugan: Should be on its own page. Juvenile recidivism is a prevalent problem in the criminal justice system. Tackling reoffending remains a complex task requiring several strategies and aims. It involves research, acknowledgement of causes, factors, exploration, and evaluation of subgroups to generate long-term, positive changes in the lives of juvenile offenders. From gang violence to Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP), researchers discover some of the reasons why juveniles

Studyspark Study Document

Juvenile Offenders and Juvenile

Pages: 37 (11154 words) Sources: 30 Subject: Criminal Justice Document: #46175369

Relevance Juvenile offenders and reoffenders are an important problem facing the United States criminal justice system. For more than one hundred years, states held the belief that the juvenile justice system acted as a vehicle to safeguard the public via offering a structure that enables the rehabilitation of children growing into adulthood. States identified the difference of children committing crimes versus adult offenders (Loeber & Farrington, 2012). For example, the states

Studyspark Study Document

Restorative Justice and Community Justice Programs

Pages: 3 (1149 words) Sources: 4 Subject: Criminal Justice Document: #16923496

Juvenile Justice System Describe the Juvenile Justice System The juvenile justice system is not just one department or building in a government facilities part of town. The juvenile justice system (JJS) is a "network of agencies that deal with juveniles whose conduct has brought them in conflict with the law" (3rd judicial district). In fact the JJS is composed of these components: police, prosecutor, detention, court, probation, and juvenile corrections facilities. When police

Studyspark Study Document

Criminal Justice System Juvenile Delinquency

Pages: 3 (842 words) Sources: 1 Subject: Criminal Justice Document: #38135176

For example, Cook County, IL, has built a network of support for juvenile female offenders within the local community. The county has developed its own gender-specific assessment and treatment guidelines and has trained youth-facing community workers on assessing juvenile offenders and recommending programming. (Juvenile Justice Journal, 1999, p. 30). Also, the county designed a pilot network of social service agencies in order to provide a community-based continuum of care. (Juvenile

Studyspark Study Document

Correctional Systems Juvenile and Adult

Pages: 2 (618 words) Sources: 2 Subject: Criminal Justice Document: #85851862

In numerous states, specific laws which govern how juvenile offenders are treated in the court and prison systems are separate "from the criminal code used for adult offenders," a situation which can often be found in other state correctional systems. Of course, all those convicted of crimes against society "must be held accountable for their actions," yet when dealing with young offenders, most state courts seems to stress this idea

Studyspark Study Document

Parole and Probation As Alternatives to Incarceration

Pages: 4 (1255 words) Sources: 5 Subject: Criminal Justice - Prisons Document: #21655238

Community Corrections as a Social Service With around 2 million Americans incarcerated in the nation's prisons and jails at a cost of tens of billions of dollars each year, policymakers are scrambling for alternative solutions and many have identified community corrections as a viable option. Using parole and probations programs, community corrections provide a valuable social service to the country by giving juvenile and adult offenders the opportunity to rejoin mainstream

Join thousands of other students and

"spark your studies".