Gun Control. One Side Rights Benefits Owning Essay

gun control. One side rights benefits owning a firearm. The side anti-gun ownership guns illegal. The final part paper position pro-gun ownership! Please make essay original.

There is much controversy regarding fire-arms, their use, and whether or not people should have access to guns. The "guns don't kill people, people kill people" expression is likely to spring to mind when considering issues related to guns. Surely, one might be inclined to say that in spite of the fact that guns are not directly responsible for the fact that people are dying, they provide humanity with a means to killing individuals. Some people are unable to effectively control an excessive amount of power and it thus seems wrong to provide them with access to fire-arms. Even with that, if the authorities focus on establishing harsher laws concerning gun ownership, individuals who are predisposed to committing crimes will no longer be able to carry a gun.

While many people consider gun ownership to be a simple privilege, it is actually a right. The Individual Rights position promotes the belief that, according to the Second Amendment, people should have access to gun ownership because they are entitled to have means of protection from governmental tyranny. The Second Amendment claims that it is the "right of the people to keep and bear arms." The self-ownership legislation makes it possible for people to do whatever they want with their bodies and with their properties as long as they violate the rights of other individuals. Even though it might seem to address different topics, gun ownership is not very different from "freedom of speech, religion and freedom of the press" (SAF Gun Rights Frequently Asked Questions).

Gun ownership does not just relate to the opinion that some people have in regard to arms, as it is actually meant to guarantee that people in the U.S. will always have the possibility to take up arms against bodies that act against principles put across by constitutional rights. Guns are not necessarily a tool that people use for the sake of sport, as they provide American citizens with the opportunity to rise against anyone who threatens their well-being and the well-being of justice as a whole. However, firearms should only be available to law-abiding individuals who are perfectly able to tell the difference between right and wrong and who are likely to act in accordance with gun ownership legislations when they need to do so.

One of the negative aspects of gun ownership is the fact that a wide range of individuals have access to firearms. Many of these people own guns because they are interested in imposing their point-of-view or because they want to commit crimes. Gun control laws are meant to minimize crime levels and prevent people from dying as a result of the fact that criminals have experience little to no problems coming in possession of a firearm. Although it is difficult to demonstrate, it is very probable that guns create an environment where crimes are easier to occur and where the masses are more vulnerable. A high level of gun ownership is…