Studyspark Study Document

Education No Child Left Behind Thesis

Pages:5 (1716 words)

Sources:6

Subject:Education

Topic:Art Education

Document Type:Thesis

Document:#55968121


What works for one child is not necessarily going to work for the next. So how can one promote the use of standardized tests as the only way to measure educational learning and success? The premise of the No Child Left Behind Act is very honorable. Each child should be taught by the best teachers that there are and each school should be held accountable for making sure that this occurs. But the measuring device that this act relies on is faulty. It places so much emphasis on the scores of the tests that all of the other educational ideas are being lost among the numbers.

References

Beveridge, Tina. (2010). No Child Left Behind and Fine Arts Classes. Arts Education Policy

Review. 111(1), p4-7.

Caillier, James. (2010). Paying Teachers According to Student Achievement: Questions

Regarding Pay-for-Performance Models in Public Education. Clearing House. 83(2),

p58-61.

Derthick, Martha and Dunn, Joshua M. (2009). False Premises: The Accountability Fetish in Education. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. 32(3), p1015-1034.

Lagana-Riordan, Christine and Aguilar, Jemel P. (2009). What's Missing from No Child Left

Behind? A Policy Analysis from a Social Work Perspective. Children & Schools. 31(3),

p135-144.

Massetti, Greta M. (2009). Enhancing Emergent Literacy Skills of Preschoolers From Low-

Income Environments Through a Classroom-Based Approach.…


Sample Source(s) Used

References

Beveridge, Tina. (2010). No Child Left Behind and Fine Arts Classes. Arts Education Policy

Review. 111(1), p4-7.

Caillier, James. (2010). Paying Teachers According to Student Achievement: Questions

Regarding Pay-for-Performance Models in Public Education. Clearing House. 83(2),

Cite this Document

Join thousands of other students and "spark your studies."

Sign Up for FREE
Related Documents

Studyspark Study Document

Child Left Behind Legislation

Pages: 6 (1663 words) Sources: 5 Subject: Education - Multiculturalism Document: #52549874

An Explication of Selected Titles of No Child Left Behind Legislation
In sum, during the period from 2002 through 2015, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) became the primary law in the United States concerning the general education of young people in grades K through 12. Some of the provisions of NCLB, especially those involving minorities and migrant children, were contentious because they operated to penalize schools that failed to demonstrate

Studyspark Study Document

No Child Left Behind -

Pages: 16 (5384 words) Sources: 10 Subject: Teaching Document: #87005254

For Bush, the "formation and refining of policy proposals" (Kingdon's second process stream in policymaking) came to fruition when he got elected, and began talking to legislators about making educators and schools accountable. Bush gave a little, and pushed a little, and the Congress make its own changes and revisions, and the policy began to take shape. The third part of Kingdon's process stream for Bush (politics) was getting the

Studyspark Study Document

No Child Left Behind

Pages: 8 (3600 words) Sources: 10 Subject: Teaching Document: #53793751

No Child Left Behind Act Analysis of articles that focus on the impact of "No Child Left Behind Act" on key stakeholders of education in the United States. January 8, 2002 was the date the No Child Left Behind Act was signed into law by President Bush; this bill reauthorized ESEA, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which was the fundamental federal law for grades one through twelve. ESEA, which includes

Studyspark Study Document

No Child Left Behind --

Pages: 5 (1589 words) Sources: 1 Subject: Teaching Document: #21523106

Growth models are more reliable in NCLB research because: a) status models depend on data that is "vertically scaled" (measuring from one grade to the next); b) status models can be linked to "individual students or schools over time"; and c) status models sometimes employ "hierarchical linear modeling" -- a more sophisticated and potentially esoteric technique (Azin, p. 74). Meanwhile, growth models are more effective in evaluating the success of

Studyspark Study Document

No Child Left Behind Act-

Pages: 10 (4609 words) Sources: 1+ Subject: Children Document: #17956453

(No Child Left behind Act Aims to Improve Success for All Students and Eliminate the Achievement Gap) Parents will also gain knowledge regarding how the quality of learning is happening in their child's class. They will get information regarding the progress of their child vis-a-vis other children. Parents have of late been given the privilege to ask for information regarding the level of skills of the teachers. It offers parents

Studyspark Study Document

No Child Left Behind and Black Males

Pages: 3 (772 words) Sources: 2 Subject: Teaching Document: #33091354

No Child Left Behind and Black Males No child left behind No Child Left Behind: Cause and Effect Essay The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was passed in 2001 in order to improve overall students' performance and to decrease the performance gap between minority and mainstream students. However other effects have emerged since its implementation. Through this cause and effect essay, author sheds light on effects of the NCLB. It has been

Join thousands of other students and

"spark your studies".