Study Document
Common Core Standards and Ieps Essay
Pages:2 (799 words)
Sources:2
Subject:English
Topic:Common Core Standard
Document Type:Essay
Document:#25653267
common core standards affect students with exceptionalities? Should we apply these standards to students with exceptionalities? Why or why not?
A lot of teachers and parents have shown great concerns related to the system of education presented for the students with special needs with the implementation of the Common Core State Standards in different states (IDA, 2015 ). These Standards are challenging and tough for the general students alone and they are made that way, so it is a bit incomprehensible to provide the same standard to the children who require special attention. These children are already going through a tough time in learning as compared to the general students and applying the Common Core Standards would make it difficult for these students to go through the learning procedure (Smith, 2014). Many educators and parents argue that testing the students with special needs with the same learning standards as of the general students is unfair and unrealistic. They state that the children with special needs require focus on life skills rather than academics as the life skills would help them in the longer run in life, so restricting them to the same standard as of everyone is not fair to the disabled children (Smith, 2014).
Educators argue that forcing the students to go through the same standards does not give them a chance to optimize goals that are attainable and the learning opportunities that are of their level. A student in eighth grade, already going through difficulties in reading texts with sentence and vocabulary complexity that are above her or his level would find it easy to learn all that on his own level. Similarly an autistic student who finds it easy to learn through simple social situations would be able to learn much quicker than if he is forced into using the difficult standards that are fixed upon him. As research shows, restricting the students to the curriculum that is beyond their capacities lowers their level of achievement. The main goal of the Common Core Standards is to help provide success to every student, however that success can only be achieved if the cognitive diversity of every student is kept in mind when making the standards (Beals, 2014).
2. In what significant ways can the Common Core Standards be integrated into students' IEPs?
In order to meet the standards of achievement, the students require instructions that are…
Sample Source(s) Used
Bibliography
Beals, K. (2014, February 21). The common core is tough on kids with Special Needs. Retrieved from www.theatlantic.com: http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/02/the-common-core-is-tough-on-kids-with-special-needs/283973/
Best, J., & Cohen, C. (n.d.). Common Core State Standards and Implications for Special Populations. McREL.
Courtade, G., & Bowder, D. (2011). Aligning IEPs to the Common Core State Standards for Students with Moderate and Severe Disabilities. Wisconsin: IEP Resources.
IDA. (2015 ). Common Core State Standards and Students with Disabilities. Retrieved from Eida.org: https://eida.org/common-core-state-standards-and-students-with-disabilities/
Related Documents
Study Document
How New York State Presents Its Core Standards for Mathematics
Education What are the differences between the Common Core Standards for grade eight and the New York State standards of mathematics? Common Core Standards For one thing, the Common Core Standards offer narrative (rather than bullet points) and go into more specific and in depth instructions through narrative. The Common Core Standards expressly mentions three critical areas out in front: a) formulating and reasoning about "expressions and equations," which includes "modeling an association
Study Document
Analysis of Inclusion in Special Education Curriculum
inclusion" is not part of the law; instead, it states that each student must be educated in the least restrictive educational environment (LRE). Analyze all sides of "inclusion," (1. full inclusion; 2. inclusion in special classes like physical education, art, or lunch; and 3. inclusion in all classes except for reading or math). Inclusion The term 'inclusion' means complete acceptance of every student which leads towards sense of acceptance and belonging
Study Document
Teaching Students With Disabilities
Special education field advisory One of the challenges of special education in the modern, standards-focused environment is the fact that while special education almost by definition demands individualized attention on the part of the teacher, standardized tests evaluate students according to a set standard outside of the parameters of their specific curriculum. In response to this, the article entitled "Special Education Field Advisory," a memorandum written by James P. DeLorenzo
Study Document
CEC Website Review
CEC Website Review Founded in 1922, Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) is an organization which works for the education of children with special needs. The professionals at CEC consist of a team of individuals who have devoted themselves to betterment of the lives of children with special gifts or disabilities. The website provides educational services and the organization itself conducts a host of webinars to for its cause. In addition to
Study Document
Instructional Design Best Practices in Special Education
Part I: Best Practices
Learning disabilities, or specific learning disabilities, is a fairly well defined category that refers to impairments in functioning, typically related to language, perception, memory, or mathematical processing. The classification includes a number of conditions including dyslexia, developmental aphasia, and brain dysfunctions but does not include intellectual disabilities or emotional disturbances (Kavale, Spaulding & Beam, 2009). Moreover, learning disabilities manifest regardless of access to opportunity and other
Study Document
R-Questions to Build the Literature
Vaughn et al. (2003) report that the identification of LD students has increased upwards of 200% since 1977, with explanations ranging from a likely outcome of the growing knowledge field, to LD as a field serving as a sink for the failures of general education to meet the needs of students of varying abilities. The study investigators find that not only is the heterogeneity of the identified students quite wide,