By using animals in research, and through animal research science learns how certain chemicals "interact with living systems"; this knowledge can be "translated into protection of humans, animals, and the environment from toxic levels of natural -- as well as man-made -- exposures (SOT, 6).
Legal and professional accountability
In Canada there are Research Ethics Boards (REBs) that have the power to authorize or reject funding for experiments with animals; when animal research proposals do not meet with proper ethical requirements, the REBs can put a halt to the experiments (Tremayne-Lloyd, et al., 2007, p. 56-57). The law in Canada -- which should be imitated in other countries that do not now have laws protecting animals -- allows that an overseeing regulatory agencies like the College of Chiropractors of Ontario (CCO) can "reprimand members and/or suspend or revoke licenses to practice" (Tremayne-Lloyd, 57). Cruelty to animals, assault on animals, or "criminal negligence" can lead to legal ramifications for the organizations conducting research using animals. An "assault" is committed when there has been no legal authorization by an REB and "force is intentionally applied" to an animal (Tremayne-Lloyd, 59). Moreover, section 446 of the Criminal Code in Canada makes it a criminal act to willfully cause "…any unnecessary pain, suffering or injury to an animal including that which results from a failure to exercise reasonable care" (Tremayne, Lloyd, 59).
In conclusion, there clearly have been many benefits for humans because animals are used in laboratory tests, but on the other hand there are instances that have been verified where animals are brutally mistreated for purposes that are not at all obvious. Regulating the use of animals, like it is done in Canada, is the best idea, short of finding alternatives to the use of animals in important research.
Works Cited
American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. (2008). Animal Research FAQ.
Retrieved April 21, 2012, from http://www.aalas.org.
Archibald, Kathy. (2005). Test People, Not Animals. New Scientist, 187(2518), 1-2.
Kolar, Roman. (2006). Animal Experimentation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 111-
PETA. (2011). Animals Used for Experimentation / Leaked Video: Live Goats' Legs Cut Off
With Tree Trimmers. Retrieved April 21, 2012, from http://www.peta.org.
Society of Toxicology. (2009). Animals in Research. Retrieved April 22, 2012, from http://www.toxicology.org/ai/air/AIR_final.pdf.
Tremayne-Lloyd, Tracey, and Srebrolow, Gary. (2007). Research ethics approval for…
Sample Source(s) Used
Works Cited
American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. (2008). Animal Research FAQ.
Retrieved April 21, 2012, from http://www.aalas.org.
Archibald, Kathy. (2005). Test People, Not Animals. New Scientist, 187(2518), 1-2.
Kolar, Roman. (2006). Animal Experimentation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 111-
Related Documents
Study Document
Animal Testing Cosmetics and Toiletries
Animal Testing: Cosmetics and Toiletries Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in a variety of experiments (Wikipedia, 2005) Many experiments aim to test certain substances to determine their effect on humans, or to test medical or psychological hypotheses. Animal testing is a very controversial and well-researched topic. Proponents and opponents constantly argue over both ethical concerns and the effectiveness of the practice of using animals for scientific research. The term "vivisection"
Study Document
Animal Testing: Pros and Cons Animal Testing
Animal Testing: Pros and Cons Animal testing is when animals are used in scientific experiments (Richards). Most animal testing is done by universities, pharmaceutical companies, and medical schools. Most animals used for research are breed for the specific purpose of testing and few animals used for testing are captured from the wild. Some animal testing is done for basic research such as behavior studies and genetics while other animal testing is
Study Document
Animal Testing Debate Animal Testing Animal Testing
Animal Testing Debate ANIMAL TESTING Animal testing as well as experimenting, is a practice that has been there from the fifteenth century, even though the activity become more popular in the 1800's. Ever since individuals that realized animals could feel pain, a debate on animal testing became an issue as well as a controversial topic. Every year scientists experiment with around 100 million monkeys, rats, dogs mice, and fish in the name of
Study Document
Nonhuman Animal Studies Animal Testing
UK legislation requires that researchers refine their procedures to keep suffering to the minimum, ensure the number of animals is reduced to the minimum required for meaningful results, and seek to replace the use of animals with non-animal alternatives where appropriate" (the Royal Society, 2004). This argument is valid from the point-of-view of the necessity of animal testing. The attempts to reduce the pain and discomfort of animals are
Study Document
Common Property and Animal Testing
Q1. List ten real-world common property resources with which you are familiar. Describe an example of one of these common property resources that is not (tragically) overexploited (use the term “institution/s” in your discussion).
The so-called tragedy of the commons is defined as the fact that people tend to exploit common resources to the maximum degree possible for their own benefit, thus indirectly harming other or future people who
Study Document
Why Animal Testing Should Be Banned
Should Animals Be Used in Scientific Testing for Medical Research or Commercial Products?
The fear and dread of you will fall on all the beasts of the earth, and on all the birds in the sky, on every creature that moves along the ground, and on all the fish in the sea; they are given into your hands. – Genesis 9:2 (c. 1450 BCE)
Studies published in prestigious medical journals