Studyspark Study Document

The Battleship Potemkin Film Analysis

Related Topics: History War Life Russia

Pages:5 (1631 words)

Sources:3

Subject:Arts

Topic:Film

Document Type:Film Analysis

Document:#15032782


Eisenstein’s 1925 silent film, produced during the Soviet era, depicts the mutiny on the Battleship Potemkin from the year 1905, prior to the Soviet takeover of the state and seen as a foreshadowing of the wider revolution that was to come. In the film, the mutineers/rebels are depicted as heroes, embodying the spirit of the fight against Tsarist oppression that the good comrades of the Soviet world wanted to project. The Cossacks (themselves a symbol of Russian tradition that the Soviet era comrades despised) and the Tsarist cavalry are depicted as brutal thugs, slaughtering the innocent people of Odessa for daring to show support for the mutineers. As Odessa was one of the most open cities for Jews to live in the Pale of Settlement, the slaughter of people can be seen also as a persecution of Jews, especially since the Soviet Revolution was largely Jewish in nature and Eisenstein himself was Jewish. Thus, there is a natural sympathy between the filmmaker and the subject. Old World Russia was not beloved by Revolutionary Russia, and the film suggests that the reason was a lack of respect for Russia’s common people—the working class, the everyday soldiers treated worse than dogs by the authorities. It is essentially Orwell’s Animal Farm without the irony. It is Soviet idealism, typical of the Soviet film era (Neff). This paper will discuss the merits of Eisenstein’s film with respect to causality and context and how historically accurate the film was.

When Lenin’s words are quoted on screen in the beginning of Battleship Potemkin it is a signal from the director that the film is meant to be an homage to revolutionary spirit of Lenin: “Revolution is war. Of all the wars known in history it is the only lawful, rightful, just, and truly great war… In Russia this war has been declared and begun” (Eisenstein). Eisenstein was both commemorating the 20th anniversary of the mutiny on the battleship and the Russian Revolution itself (Neff). The speech given by Vakulinchuk, one of the leaders of the mutiny in real life, echoes the Revolutionary ideals and indicates that there was indeed a revolutionary spirit already in the air by 1905, a dozen years before the 1917 Soviet takeover. Thus, by rooting the revolution in the context of the Potemkin mutiny and in an imagined slaughter of innocent Odessans (i.e., Jews), Eisenstein subconsciously links the persecution of Jews with the Russian Revolution as though to indicate that Revolution was the Jews’ moment of glorious revenge.

What the film does not show is that in real life the most well-trained and experienced naval officers of the ships in the Black Sea Fleet had been replaced by unformed recruits and incapable officers when the Fleet’s best were transferred to the Pacific to fill the gaps left by losses sustained from the Russo-Japanese War of the same time. This would explain the rather pitiful and shabby treatment of the unhappy sailors on the Potemkin: their usual commanders likely would have handled the situation much better instead of escalating the conflict as the officers in the film (and in real life) did. The difference is that…

Some parts of this document are missing

Click here to view full document

…on strike. But the massacre and the cause and effect were twisted by Eisenstein (Osborn).

What Eisenstein also leaves out is that the heroic ending wherein the sailors of the Potemkin are permitted to sail away by other mutineers aboard other battleships sent to stop was not really the end of the story. The actual Potemkin was permitted to depart but it was not permitted to dock anywhere. The mutineers were all eventually killed or arrested. It was not a glorious ending at all. The other ship that saw a mutiny faired even worse.

In conclusion, the film The Battleship Potemkin is a piece of Soviet propaganda through and through. Though recognized as a brilliant piece of filmmaking, shocking and dramatic in turns, from the perspective of history it is completely slanted, telling the events from the perspective of a Soviet twenty years later, filling the film with small details and offensive caricatures of Old World Russia that simply were not true. Eisenstein misrepresents the facts about Potemkin, the facts about what happened at Odessa when the soldiers arrived, and the facts about what happened to the so-called heroes aboard the ship when the left the port. The film plays up the ideals of the Revolution but is as truthful in its depiction of what happened as Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. Both are fantasies that take as their starting point a real time and place where real people existed and acted, where real movements and events serve as the backdrop. Both use that real history as a canvas…


Sample Source(s) Used

Works Cited

Bascomb, Neal. Red Mutiny: Eleven Fateful Days on the Battleship Potemkin. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2007.

Eisenstein, Sergei. The Battleship Potemkin.

Neff, Taylor. "Propaganda on the Big Screen: Film in the Soviet Union from 1925 to 1936." The FGCUStudent Research Journal 3.2 (2017).

Osborn, Andrew. “Potemkin: the mutiny, the movie and the myth.” The Independent, June 14, 2005. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/potemkin-the-mutiny-the-movie-and-the-myth-225737.html

Cite this Document

Join thousands of other students and "spark your studies."

Sign Up for FREE
Related Documents

Studyspark Study Document

Black Girl by Ousmane Sembene Battleship Potemkin by Sergei Eisenstien...

Pages: 2 (641 words) Subject: Film Document: #98602608

Battleship Potemkin by Sergei Eisenstien and Black Girl by Ousmane SembeneIn the movie �Battleship Potemkin,� Eisenstein used the filmmaking technique called tertium quid, representing the connection of individual scene parts to create a bigger picture. It was not only about the combination of the images but also the message to be disseminated to the target audience.Based on montage theory, the development of suspense and rhythm created rationality in which concepts

Studyspark Study Document

John Grierson the Documentary Film

Pages: 75 (22277 words) Sources: 1+ Subject: Film Document: #7276200

From this came our insistence on the drama of the doorstep" (cited by Hardy 14-15). Grierson also notes that the early documentary filmmakers were concerned about the way the world was going and wanted to use all the tools at hand to push the public towards greater civic participation. With the success of Drifters, Grierson was able to further his ideas, but rather than directing other films, he devoted his time

Studyspark Study Document

Francis Bacon's Seated Figure 1961

Pages: 7 (2212 words) Sources: 5 Subject: Art  (general) Document: #65859062

It is through the presentation of pain and suffering that the viewer is forced to identify with them. Bacon is not just showing us violence so that we may associate it with the process of self-actualization, however. Amidst pain and suffering, Bacon's painting forces us to ask if there is anything that can transcend the violence and the suffering. There is a certain ethical dimension to violence and suffering that

Studyspark Study Document

Myth of the American Dream:

Pages: 2 (658 words) Sources: 2 Subject: Government Document: #94996596

Paine is broken and reveals the entire scheme. Similarly, Dumbo suggests that a belief in one's self can accomplish anything, even in the face of the most seemingly insurmountable obstacles. Dumbo is the story of an elephant with enormous ears. Dumbo is a freak and the mockery of the circus. His mother is taken away after she tries to protect him. The circus is a cruel and judgmental environment that

Studyspark Study Document

Silent Film Nanook of the North by Robert Flaherty

Pages: 6 (2202 words) Sources: 5 Subject: Film Document: #9922219

Silent Film: Robert Flaherty and Nanook of the North Robert Flaherty is one of the most renowned filmmakers of all time. He was born in 1883 and died in 1951, so that his life and work encompassed what is frequently referred to as the Golden Age of cinema. Although Flaherty was an American, he lived near the U.S./Canadian border, and went to Toronto for his schooling. His early work experience was

Join thousands of other students and

"spark your studies".