Plato Gorgias
Based on your interpretation of "The Gorgias," what is the relationship between philosophy and politics, in a democracy? How does the debate between Callicles and Socrates inform your answer to this question?
In the dialogue entitled "Gorgias," the title character, a teacher of rhetoric, does rhetorical battle with the philosopher Socrates. Several individuals enter the dialogue, most notably Callicles, whom over the course of this dialogue emerges as a rather callous individual. His attitudes emerge as proof that although Gorgias calculatingly instructs individuals in the proper way to comport themselves to sway the masses, such sophistry is a false way to decide how best to govern and who is best to govern.
The ideas stressed in Callicles' philosophy of government are diametrically opposed to that of Socrates, the dialogue suggests, because Callicles simply wishes to win arguments, rather than to establish what is right and just. Socrates, on the other hand, aspires to the true and actual attainment of wisdom. However, outside of the general negative tone towards rhetoric in the construction of "The Gorgias" as a dialogue between Socrates and the sophists, the latter, even including the philosophy Callicles, it might be said, does not advocate an entirely indefensible position.
After all, relational truth is based in the individual's self-perception, according to democratic notions of opinion -- what is right and correct for one human being is not necessarily the best for another human being. Furthermore, obtaining the tools of rhetorical persuasion enables an individual, in a democracy, to persuade other individuals of his or her point-of-view in the marketplace of ideas. The teacher Gorgias advocates this in a way that is not particularly persuasive over the course of the dialogue, as he sounds a bit like an Athenian soft-soap seller from Madison Avenue, advocating that with his teaching, one will be able to convince the banker, the doctor, and anyone to do one's bidding. Persuasion itself, he says, is the chief tool of rhetoric and the object of the skill. Calicles seems to be the most intent on abusing this skill, equating the ability to persuade and obtain power with what is good and true.
It is perhaps here, that philosophy must enter into the question. Although Socrates disparages rhetoric and the…
Sample Source(s) Used
Works Cited
Plato. "Gorgias." Translated with introduction, notes, and interpretive essay by James H. Nichols.
Related Documents
Study Document
Gorgias, Encomium of Helen in the English
Gorgias, Encomium of Helen In the English language in the twenty-first century, the term "sophistry" still exists to refer to a plausible-sounding but misleading argument, an evaluatively negative term to describe bad reasoning. Although the term derives from the original Sophists in Athens in the 5th century BCE, the modern usage of the term is inaccurate in describing the likes of the Sophist Gorgias. By examining Gorgias' "Encomium of Helen" and
Study Document
Plato: Phaedo the Socratic Method
Socrates asked them to come forward with their thoughts if they were "still doubtful about the argument." The two proceed to make a sophisticated argument, contrary to Socrates' points, that were counterexamples to the points about the body and the soul that Socrates had been making with such eloquence. It was cross-examination, but it was also a series of new hypotheses that Cebes and Simmias presented to the philosopher
Study Document
Plato's and Socrates' Criticism of Rhetoric in
Plato's (and Socrates') Criticism of Rhetoric in "Gorgias" In Plato's philosophical work entitled "Gorgias," the philosopher's criticism of the method of rhetoric as a form of persuasion is the primary focus of Plato's written work. In the said philosophical and ethical discourse, Plato uses the character of Socrates as the 'voice' or transmitter of the message that Plato wants to extend to his readers/audience. "Gorgias" is a philosophical discourse in that
Study Document
Plato's Theory of Being and Becoming, and
Plato's theory of Being and Becoming, and its relations to the forms, is rooted in the dichotomy between being and not-being. Prior to Socrates the Sophists, from Parminedes to Gorgias, had argued that because it was impossible by definition for Nothing to exist, it was impossible to describe or vocalize a negative state, and therefore also impossible to utter falsehood. "And now arises the greatest difficulty of all. If
Study Document
Plato and Thucydides
Thucydides and Plato had conflicting methods in their attitudes toward the good life. Thucydides demonstrates empirical thinking in his readings of human nature and comportment throughout the Peloponnesian War and Plato demonstrates normative thinking in the writing within his books and discourses in particular Gorigia. Plato's interpretations of a good life revolve on principles that an individual has reached contentment. What contentment means to Plato is a person who has
Study Document
Socrates and Gorgias by Plato,
This is really the extent of Gorgias attempting to remove himself from Socrates' argument, but instead, pulls him deeper into the intellectual trap, for Gorgias has only one misgiving about the entire situation . . . he fears that the crowd of onlookers might be disinterested in two men trying to outdo each other in being wrong (458b-c). Thus, Gorgias proves two things: he cannot intellectually handle a multi-layered