Studyspark Study Document

Capital Structure Decision and the Cost of Capital A-Level Coursework

Related Topics: Ebay Debt Pay Equity Loan

Pages:4 (1561 words)

Sources:4

Subject:Business

Topic:Debt Financing

Document Type:A-Level Coursework

Document:#89101852


Business -- Corporate Finance -- Capital Structure Decisions and the Cost of Capital

Based on the readings of the module and upon reviewing total debt/equity ratios, company betas, profitability ratios, company revenue, assets, and liabilities, and the nature of the operations of the companies, including the nature of their customers and products, what would you recommend to be the capital structure (total liabilities or debt and equity proportions) for each of the three companies?

a) eBay, Inc.

The nature of eBay's business is global online retail connecting more than 124 million buyers and sellers for the sale and purchase of more than 500 million items (eBay, Inc., 2013). As of September 30, 2013, measured in thousands, eBay's: total current assets are $23,476,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); long-term assets are $40,067,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); current liabilities are $12,028,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); long-term liabilities are $17,300,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); revenue is $3,892,000 (Yahoo, Inc., 2013); total debt/equity ratio is $17,300,000 (total liabilities)/$22,767,000 (total stockholder equity) = 0.759871744 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); profit margin is $689,000 (net income)/$3,892,000 (revenues) = 0.177029805 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); returns on assets are $2,609,000 (annual earnings)/$37,074,000 (total assets) = 0.070372768 (Yahoo, Inc., 2013); return on equity ratio is $2,609,000 (Net Income)/$20,865,000 (Shareholder's Equity) = -0.125041936 (Yahoo, Inc., 2013); and beta is 0.8 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013). EBay is the second riskiest of the 3 companies examined, with a beta of 0.8. Since eBay's return on equity ratio is low

(-0.125041936), eBay appears uncertain about its future and is in a bad position to incur more debt (Damodaran, 2005, p. 18). In order to "get optimal," we would ask: whether the actual debt ratio is greater than the optimal debt ratio, which it is; whether the company is in danger of bankruptcy, which it does not appear to be; whether it has good projections in cost of equity in cost of capital, which it does not; in which case, eBay should pay off its high debt with its retained earnings, reduce or eliminate its stock dividends, issue new sources of equity and pay off its debt (Damodaran, 2005, p. 90).

b) The Clorox Company

The nature of The Clorox Company's business is the global manufacture and sale of cleaning products, home care products, cat litter, charcoal, dressings and sauces, water filtration products, bags, wraps, containers, and natural personal care products (The Clorox Company, 2013). As of September 30, 2013, measured in thousands, The Clorox Company's: total current assets are $1,420,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); long-term assets are $4,311,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); current liabilities are $1,134,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); long-term liabilities are $4,220,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); revenue is $1,364,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); total debt/equity ratio is $4,371,000 (total liabilities)/$152,000 (total stockholder equity) = 28.75657895 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); profit margin is $572,000 (net income)/$5,623,000 (revenues) = 0.101725058 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); returns on assets are $975,000 (annual earnings)/$4,311,000 (total assets) = 0.226165623 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); return on equity ratio is $572,000 (net income)/$146,000 (shareholder's equity) = 3.917808219 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); and beta is 0.48 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013). The Clorox Company is the least risky of the 3 companies examined, with the low beta of 0.48. This company has a relatively high return on equity ratio (3.917808219) and is quite a stable, established company. To determine the optimal capital structure for The Clorox Company, we would ask: whether its actual debt ratio is greater or lesser than its levered debt ratio, which it is not; whether it is a takeover target, which it is not; whether it has good projected cost of equity and cost of capital, which it does; therefore, the company should pursue good projects with debt (Damodaran, 2005, p. 90).

c) Alaska Air Group, Inc.

The nature of the Alaska Air Group, Inc.'s business is passenger and cargo air transportation spanning 60 cities in 3 countries (Alaska Air Group, Inc., 2013). As of September 30, 2013, measured in thousands, Alaska Air Group Inc.'s: total current assets are $1,935,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); long-term assets are $5,862,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); current liabilities are $1,650,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); long-term liabilities are $4,060,000 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); revenue is $4,657,000; total debt/equity ratio is $4,060,000 (total liabilities)/$1,802,000 (total stockholder equity) = 2.253052164 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013); profit margin is $289,000 (net income)/$1,556,000 (revenues) = 0.185732648; returns on assets are $560,000 (annual earnings)/$5,505,000 (total assets) = 0.101725704; return on equity ratio is $316,000 (net income) / $1,421,000 (shareholder's equity) = 0.222378607; and beta is 1.06 (Yahoo! CA Finance, 2013). The Alaska Air Group, Inc. is the riskiest of the 3 companies examined, with the highest beta of 1.06. To find the optimal capital structure for this company, we should ask: whether the actual debt ratio is greater or lesser than the optimal debt ratio, which it certainly is; whether it is a bankruptcy risk, which it is and has been for some time. In this case, the company should quickly reduce its debt by making an equity for debt swap, selling assets and using the cash to pay off debts, renegotiating with its lenders (Damodaran, 2005, p. 90).

d) Debt over equity financing

Companies tend to prefer equity financing over debt financing. First, the investors are making an investment committed to the business and company projects (Peavler, 2013). Secondly, the company can avoid the expenses of business loans, such as interest, which frees up those funds for more capital in the company's activities (Damodaran, 2005, p. 4). Third, the investors can assist in developing and achieving new business ideas. Fourth, some of the investors the company may attract can help with new skills, contacts, strategies and key decisions. Fifth, the investors have a vested interest in the success of the company (Peavler, 2013). Sixth, investors may provide additional funding as the company grows and its goals expand. Simultaneously, there are disadvantages to equity financing (Peavler, 2013). First, it takes considerable time and effort to obtain and maintain equity financing, which could otherwise be spent on the company's essential activities. Secondly, a potential investor will delve into the company's history, forecasts and management. Third, company management may lose some power to the investors and have a reduced share in the business (Damodaran, 2005, p. 20). Fourth, the company and investors will have to deal with laws and regulations governing equity financing. Fifth, the company will not receive the benefits of higher taxes connected with debt financing (Damodaran, 2005, p. 20). On balance, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of equity financing over debt financing in the view of many companies.

2) What do you perceive you have learned in the Module 4 Case Assignment? Which of the following learning outcomes do you feel you have mastered?

Module 4 has allowed me to obtain a beginner's knowledge about: bonds, which is debt instrument used to raise capital (Damodaran, 2005, p. 4) and other debt instruments, such as bank loans (Damodaran, 2005, p. 4), in capital plans. Module 4 has also taught me about debt financing vs. equity financing, which is discussed in section c, and optimal capital structure, which is a mix of debt and equity tailored to a specific company's needs (Damodaran, 2005, p. 6). Module 4 has also given me practical experience in working with balance sheet and income sheet figures in order to arrive at different aspects of a company's financial life. At the very least, it has given me a glimpse of just how complex and varied the financial lives of companies can be. At this point, I certainly would not hire me as an expert regarding capital plans, financing or capital structure; however, Module 4 has opened the door of all those areas for me.

References

Alaska Air Group, Inc. (2013). Historical overview. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from www.alaskaair.com Web site: http://www.alaskaair.com/content/about-us/history/overview.aspx

Damodaran, A. (2005). Finding the right financial mix: The capital structure decision. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from pages.stern.nyu.edu Web site: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/cfovhds/capstr.pdf

eBay, Inc. (2013). One company | ebay inc. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from www.ebayinc.com Web site: http://www.ebayinc.com/who_we_are/one_company

Peavler, R. (2013). Debt and equity financing. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from bizfinance.about.com Web site: http://bizfinance.about.com/od/generalinformatio1/a/debtequityfin.htm

The Clorox Company. (2013). The Clorox Company | Company. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from www.thecloroxcompany.com Web site: http://www.thecloroxcompany.com/company/

Yahoo! CA Finance. (2013, September 30). ALK balance sheet. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from ca.finance.yahoo.com Web site: http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=ALK

Yahoo! CA Finance. (2013). ALK basic chart. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from ca.finance.yahoo.com Web site: http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=ALK

Yahoo! CA Finance. (2013, September 30). ALK income statement. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from ca.finance.yahoo.com Web site: http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=ALK

Yahoo! CA Finance. (2013, September 30). CLX balance sheet. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from ca.finance.yahoo.com Web site: http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=CLX

Yahoo! CA Finance. (2013). CLX basic chart. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from ca.finance.yahoo.com: http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=CLX

Yahoo! CA Finance. (2013, September 30). CLX income statement. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from ca.finance.yahoo.com Web site: http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=CLX

Yahoo! CA Finance. (2013, September 30). eBay balance sheet. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from ca.finance.yahoo.com Web site: http://ca.finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=EBAY

Yahoo! CA Finance.…


Sample Source(s) Used

References

Alaska Air Group, Inc. (2013). Historical overview. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from www.alaskaair.com Web site: http://www.alaskaair.com/content/about-us/history/overview.aspx

Damodaran, A. (2005). Finding the right financial mix: The capital structure decision. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from pages.stern.nyu.edu Web site: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/pdfiles/cfovhds/capstr.pdf

eBay, Inc. (2013). One company | ebay inc. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from www.ebayinc.com Web site: http://www.ebayinc.com/who_we_are/one_company

Peavler, R. (2013). Debt and equity financing. Retrieved December 1, 2013 from bizfinance.about.com Web site: http://bizfinance.about.com/od/generalinformatio1/a/debtequityfin.htm

Cite this Document

Join thousands of other students and "spark your studies."

Sign Up for FREE
Related Documents

Studyspark Study Document

Capital Structure Decision and the Cost of Capital

Pages: 5 (1480 words) Sources: 1+ Subject: Economics Document: #34676351

Capital Structure Decision and Cost of Capital In basic terms, capital structure has got to do with how companies finance their overall operations using various sources of funds. In this text, I recommend what is in my opinion the optimal capital structure for the three companies selected for purposes of this discussion. The companies that will be used for purposes of this discussion are: Alaska Air Group, the Clorox Group, and

Studyspark Study Document

Capital Structure Decision and Cost of Capital

Pages: 2 (768 words) Sources: 1+ Subject: Economics Document: #19541340

Capital Structure Decision and Cost of Capital My SLP Company of choice is Wal-Mart Stores. The other two companies I will be relying on for purposes of this discussion are Target Corp. And Costco Wholesale Corporation. Both companies happen to be in the same industry as Wal-Mart Stores. Most specifically, this text will compute the debt ratio and the debt-to-equity ratio of Wal-Mart Stores and discuss whether or not these ratios

Studyspark Study Document

Corporate Capital Structure Decisions Are

Pages: 4 (1169 words) Subject: Economics Document: #21347935

Statement 3 Another important issue to consider in the contraction of debt is represented by the impact of this debt on the company stakeholders -- employees, business partners, the public, and most importantly, the share holders. The primary scope of the economic agent is that of creating value for its stakeholders, but excessive debt could jeopardize this desire, especially since debt is money that has to be repaid and it as

Studyspark Study Document

Capital Structure Modigliani and Miller Argued That

Pages: 4 (1312 words) Sources: 5 Subject: Economics Document: #72578686

Capital Structure Modigliani and Miller argued that capital structure is irrelevant, all other things being equal, but in the real world those other things are never equal. The factors that are ruled out of MM are neutral taxes, no capital market frictions, symmetric access to credit markets, and that firm finance policy reveals no information. Normally, arguments against the irrelevance of capital structure are based on these factors that MM assumed

Studyspark Study Document

Capital Structure Generally the Capital

Pages: 7 (2932 words) Sources: 1+ Subject: Economics Document: #55511809

All theories of capital structure are considered supplementary. As Myers pointed out it is a 'kind of puzzle and every new theory fills a small gap'. (Does Capital Structure really matter?) Evaluating the tradeoff and pecking order theory Shyam-Sunder and Myers by analyzing the debt patterns through time they could find out that under the pecking order model, "a regression of debt financing on the firms deficit of funds should

Studyspark Study Document

Capital Budgeting Sunk Costs Are Costs That

Pages: 2 (752 words) Sources: 5 Subject: Economics Document: #69973076

Capital Budgeting Sunk costs are costs that have already been incurred. So for example if a company spent money on a marketing assessment for a new product, that would not be included in the decision to bring that product to market because that money was already spent. Sunk costs are not included in a capital budgeting analysis. Opportunity costs are not included in a capital budgeting analysis. An opportunity cost is something

Join thousands of other students and

"spark your studies".