Moral Law
Sun Tzu understood that if a country or a culture is to go to war against an enemy, then the leader of that country or culture must have the total support of his people and particularly of his warriors. He describes this phenomenon as the "Moral Law" which he asserts it the first of five "constant factors" in the art of going to war.
Do morality, ethics, or the moral law cause people to be enthusiastically supportive of their leader? First, the answer is yes to the question. Secondly, as to why this is a true statement, when the topic of "moral law" is raised -- in the sense that citizens (and soldiers) are in "complete accord with their ruler…undismayed by any danger" -- it should also be understood that there is another concept very similar to moral law. It is called "nationalism," and according to iconic author George Orwell, patriotism is "…devotion to a particular place and a particular way of life," which people believe to be the "best in the world" but people have no desire to push it on other nations. But nationalism, Orwell continued, is the feeling that one's way of life "…is superior to others…and this feeling can lead a group to impose their way of life on others" (Lyon, 1011).
While Sun Tzu's message in the Art of War is basically about strategies and tactics that military commanders should follow when engaged in preparations for war -- and in war itself -- the question for this paper relates to citizens following their leaders "enthusiastically and fearlessly" vis-a-vis the "moral law," and that was the case when the United States invaded Iraq in 2003.
TWO: How does the moral law cause people to fearlessly follow their leader? Clearly the "moral law" was the over-riding factor in Congress giving President George W. Bush the legal authority to militarily push dictator Saddam Hussein from power and destroy the alleged "weapons of mass destruction." Of course it turned out there were no weapons of mass destruction, but the way in which Bush presented the case to the American people stirred a sense of strong patriotism leading to nationalism within the American populace.
In professor Gerald Webster's peer-reviewed article ("American Nationalism, the Flag, and the Invasion of Iraq") the author explains that the "spike in… nationalism inhibited an honest debate over the wisdom of invading Iraq…" about eighteen…
Sample Source(s) Used
Works Cited
Dumm, Thomas L. (2006). George W. Bush and the F-Word. South Atlantic Quarterly, 105(1),
153-160.
Lyon, Grant. (2011). Patriotism vs. Nationalism in a Post 9/11 World. HuffPost. Retrieved February 16, 2012, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com.
SourceWatch. (2008). Treating Dissent as Treason. Retrieved February 16, 2012, from http://www.sourcewatch.org.
Related Documents
Study Document
Morality in America Morals Are Defined As
Morality in America Morals are defined as a set of principles of right action and behavior for the individual. The traditional morals of any given society are the set of moral principles by which the majority of its members have lived over a long time, a consensus which that society has reached on what is considered correct and decent behavior. It is the way one's society expectsone to behave, even if
Study Document
Moral Situation
Moral Situation Both Tom and Joe contributed to the deaths of their wives. However, Tom's actions are more severe than Joe's are. In fact, Joe did not actually take any action at all. Tom actually, purposefully, and maliciously administered the poison, whereas in Joe's case, his wife accidentally took the poison herself. Her death can be considered an accidental suicide, whereas Tom's wife's death was an out-and-out murder. Tom's actions were
Study Document
Moral, Legal, Political, and Practical
The line of legitimacy, separating socially approvable use of force from violence, cannot be effectively drawn without an agreement on what constitutes the optimum amount of force necessary to maintain social order and to protect human rights against encroachment. A society subscribing to infinite morality which condemns all use of force as immoral is doomed no less than a society accepting the absolute pragmatism of tyrants. " As Oleg Zinam
Study Document
Moral Philosophy
Moral Philosophy Can desires and feelings be in accordance with or contrary to reason? Are they under the control of, or guided by, reason? Compare, contrast, and critically evaluate the answers of Aristotle and Hume to these questions and their arguments in support of those answers. David Hume is one of the most significant philosophers of the 18th Century. Hume is skeptical about moral truths, and he ascertains that ethics comes from
Study Document
Law and Technological Developments Justin Ellsworth's Parents
Law and Technological Developments Justin Ellsworth's parents should not have been given access to his e-mail correspondence. Notwithstanding the court order, Yahoo!'s decision to disclose Mr. Ellsworth's e-mail to his parents seriously compromises privacy rights and is not supported under either a utilitarian or deontological moral framework. The Utilitarian Perspectives According to West (2004), "[u]tilitarianism is the ethical theory that the production of happiness and reduction of unhappiness should be the standard by
Study Document
Moral and Emotional Responses to the Challenge
Moral and Emotional Responses to the Challenge of Thrasymachus Might makes right. So suggests the character of Thrasymachus in Plato's "Republic." In other words, justice and morality is merely defined by who is stronger. The proper role of morality in both reason and the emotions is dependant simply upon what one wants to do, at that point in time, and how one can best achieve one's objective. In politics, the strongest