Aristotle chapter in “Reality.”
The chapter on Aristotle in Westphal and Levenson’s (1994) book, Reality, presents an argument based on Aristotle’s (384- 322 B.C) work. The philosopher is believed, far and wide, to be more empirically minded than Plato, his teacher. Considered “the greatest mind of antiquity,” Aristotle was the most significant intellectual authority when it came to the sciences and philosophy. The chapter attempts at logically ascertaining the answer to the question of what is real, in the end, outlining the defining traits of ultimate reals or substances (p. 45). In this essay, the main arguments put down in the book on Aristotle’s views, and thoughts will be dealt with.
The predicate’s definition, as well as name, should predict the topic. ‘Man,’ for example, predicates individual men, with the species name ‘man’ applied to individuals, as the word ‘man’ is utilized to describe the individual; the word’s definition predicates individual men as well, as the individual is animal as well as man. Therefore, the definition, as well as the species name, can predicate the individual. Meanwhile, concerning components of a subject, often, neither the definition nor the name can be predicated of that they exist in. The definition can never be predicted, but nothing exists in some instances to prevent name usage.
All things except for primary substances can either exist within or be predicated of some primary substance, which becomes clear when referring to distinct occurring instances. ‘Animal’ predicates the human (‘man’) species, and hence, individual men, since, if no individual existed to the predicate, it would be utterly non-predicable of the human (‘man’) species. Once again, color exists in the body, and thus within individual bodies, since if no individual bodies existed wherein it existed, it could not exist – in fact, it could not ever exist in the body. Hence, all things with the exception of primary substances are either being predicated of or existing within, primary substances. Should the last be non- existent, it would not be possible for any other thing to exist.
When it comes to secondary substance, the species more accurately prove to be substance as compared to the genus, as it is associated more directly with the primary substance. This is because, if any individual ought to explain primary substances, he/ she would be rendering a more informative account, which would be more relevant to the given subject, by defining the species as opposed to the genus. Hence, he/ she would be providing a more informative explanation of the person through making the following statement. In essence, he was a man, and not he was an animal, as the former explanation is, to a greater extent, characteristic of the individual, whereas the latter description is overly generic. Once again, a man rendering a description of an individual tree’s nature will provide a more informative account through citing the species (i.e., ‘tree’) as opposed to citing its genus (i.e., ‘plant’).
The most…
…using a transformation in the actual substance itself.
Let such statements be sufficient when it comes to the topic of substance.
The substance is Aristotle’s topic of inquiry, as the causes and rules that are sought belong to the substance. If our universe is regarded as a whole, the very first component of it would be substance, which adheres simply due to serial succession. From this perspective as well, substance comes first, and subsequently, quality and quantity.
Sensible substances can be changed, not if the change occurs due to intermediates or opposites, as well as not from every opposite (as the voice isn’t white but doesn’t, consequently, become white), but due to the conflicting state since contraries don’t change.
A point to be borne in mind here is that neither form nor matter comes into being – here, Aristotle implies the last form and matter. Because all things that change are some things and are altered by something. The thing that transforms it constitutes the immediate mover; the matter represents the thing altered, and the form refers to the thing it is transformed into. Substances are of three kinds – the matter, ’this’ in its appearance (as every single thing marked by contact rather than organic unity makes up substratum and matter, as all these makeup matters, with the very last matter being the matter of something that, in a total sense, is a substance); nature that is a positive state or ‘this’ toward which…
References
Levenson, C. A., & Westphal, J. (Eds.). (1994). “Aristotle “Reality is individuals,” from the categories and from the metaphysics,” in Reality. Hackett Publishing.
Study Document
perceive as Aristotle's best work known work on ethics, Nichomachean Ethics, sheds light on what Aristotle believed was happiness. "…happiness would seem to need this sort of prosperity added also; that is why some people identify happiness with good fortune, while others < eacting from one extreme to the other> identify it with virtue" (Aristotle, Irwin, & Fine, p. 360). His perception of what is happiness implies: that it itself is
Study Document
Philosophy In Book I of Plato's Republic, Thrasymachus, Glaucon, and Adeimantus provide intellectual foils for Socrates's ethical philosophy. Socrates responds to Thrasymachus's stance, which is essentially that, "the life of an unjust person is better than that of a just one," (p 88; 347e). Thrasymachus goes so far as to state that justice is "noble naivete," and therefore not worth pursuing at all (348c). Glaucon immediately takes the side of Thrasymachus,
Study Document
Plato & Aristotle The Platonic theory of knowledge is divided into two parts: a quest first to discover whether there are any unchanging objects and to identify and describe them and second to illustrate how they could be known by the use of reason, that is, via the dialectical method. Plato used various literary devices for illustrating his theory; the most famous of these is the allegory of the cave in
Study Document
Barstow, Marjorie. "Oedipus Rex as the Ideal Tragic Hero of Aristotle." The Classical Weekly, vol. 6, no. 1, 2-4, 1912. Print. Barstow observes one of Aristotle's fundamental points in her essay, which is that "Aristotle finds the end of human endeavor to be happiness…[which proceeds] from a steady and comprehensive intellectual vision which views life steadily and distinguishes in every action the result to be gained" (2). Poetry, like Oedipus Rex, helps
Study Document
Science, Religion, And the Making of the Modern Mind: Plato and Aristotle The question of whether or not knowledge is identical to mere true belief goes as far back as Plato, as he argued that correct judgment, though a necessity for knowledge, is not sufficient for it. To reinforce his argument, Plato explains the nature and structure of human knowledge using a set of relevant theories and dialogues. Aristotle, a student
Study Document
This is where social distance comes in; the survey referenced by Parrillo (3-4) shows that non-ethnic Caucasian college student do not sense a social distance from each other, but when it comes to other Europeans, to African-Americans, Latinos -- and especially Muslims -- there is a gap in acceptance that falls into the category as social distance (4). While colleges are supposed to be a microcosm of the greater society,