Study Document
Pages:1 (337 words)
Sources:2
Subject:Government
Topic:Military
Document Type:Essay
Document:#56771290
AirPower capabilities have made it the “easy call”
I agree with what you say about the article by John Garofano. Senior military leaders need to have a combination of both military analysis and political relevancies. However, I believe that there is also a need to have a critical analysis of the importance of airpower before any deployment. Military leaders will receive gratification only if they properly understand the cost implications of deploying airpower (Garofano 2000). Airpower can be deployed easily and most senior leaders have been overly reliant on this deployment to justify their continued use of airpower.
The recent event that took place in Iran regarding the shooting down of the UAV demonstrates how easily they can be taken over. The assumption that there is a data loss or data breach when this happens is not true. This is because the UAVs do not store any data and all data is captured and saved on the remote servers. Therefore, when the UAV is shot down the only loss incurred is that of the damage to the UAV. Intelligence gathering can be easily done using the UAVs without the enemy forces realizing (Kalilizad and Shapiro 2002).
With proper analysis of the cost implications of deploying the UAV then military leaders will come to understand the impact of their decision. Therefore, understanding the cost incurred when one is shot down will be an eye-opener to them, which is what GEN Ridgway would have voiced to the senior leaders. Even though most UAVs currently fly so high the likelihood of them being shot down is demonstrated in the Iranian incidence. This makes the use of airpower less seductive not unless the senior leaders have performed the correct military analysis before they recommend the use of airpower.
References
Garofano, John. 2000. "Deciding on military intervention: What is the role of senior military leaders?" Naval War College Review LIII (2):40-64.
Kalilizad, Z, and J Shapiro. 2002. United States Air and Space Power in the 21st Century. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Study Document
Since Airpower entered the scene as an element of military power in World War I, war is no longer what it used to be. Air power has introduced technology-enabled capabilities and its impact on warfare has been enormous. The impact of airpower technology on war has been wrongly perceived by some. When it was first used in World War I, the observation and surveillance capabilities of air power very rapidly
Study Document
B-29 and B-26 bombers were used by U.S. forces to decimate Korean cities through round-the-clock air war using incendiary bombs, delayed demolition explosives and an "infernal jelly" called napalm.[footnoteRef:38] Created secretly during World War II, napalm was basically a mixture of petroleum and a thickening agent, designed to fiercely adhere to the target and severely burn it. Though first used against enemy structures and humans in World War II,
Study Document
In spite of the considerable headway achieved in the African continent, a large number of states continue to experience political instability and turbulence, spilling into other areas. Numerous countries have been witnessing brutal extremism and jihadist terrorism. Such factions� attacks are becoming increasingly more lethal, with recent attacks targeting America�s interests and its people, and expanding into new regions. The National Security Strategy continually collaborates with partners for defeating terror
Study Document
History Of American War: Aerial Warfare Since time immemorial, warring sides in battles have sought ways of gaining strategic advantages over their enemies. Those who manage to get that one crucial advantage during war have an added advantage and, hence, a higher probability of winning the war. For a long time, militaries from across the world have sought to take to the air and advance their ability to not only launch
Study Document
Their job is: to ensure that all regions are receiving the proper amount of support, to prevent opposition forces from taking advantage of the situation and to communicate with local government / military officials / NGOs / nonprofit organizations. This will streamline decision making and ensure that there is effective collaboration among personnel. Moreover, this individual has experience in working with disasters and other security operations. (Warning Order) ("Navy
Study Document
It would construct a credible, but false, situation to deceive or lead the target to act in a manner, which would accomplish the commander's goal. When the target accepted the deception, the commander determined the means or methods needed to present the events. The manual demonstrated the mechanism of "Conditioning an Adversary" through the case of the Egyptian crossing the Suez in 1973. It consisted that deceptive measures and