Studyspark Study Document

Restorative Justice Instead of Mandatory Minimums Essay

Pages:4 (1258 words)

Sources:5

Document Type:Essay

Document:#81171581


Mandatory Minimum SentencingAbstractMandatory minimum sentencing requires that offenders serve a predefined term for certain crimes, commonly serious and violent offenses, and judges are bound by law to enforce them. Explain the reasons why there have been calls to repeal or reform mandatory minimum sentencing laws. Based on your findings, are you in favor of repealing mandatory minimum sentencing laws?IntroductionMandatory minimum sentencing was part of a set of strict guidelines implemented during a get tough on crime / War on Drugs era during the 1990s that resulted in an explosion of the prison population. By the 21st century, nearly half of all inmates in federal or state prison were incarcerated for non-violent crimes that resulted from this set of strict guidelines (Smith & Hattery, 2006). The cost of imprisonment had reached $10 billion annually (Smith & Hattery, 2006). Yet, alternative sentencing, such as restorative justice programs, has been found to be more effective at reducing crime and rates of recidivism and represents a mere fraction of the cost that incarceration represents (Johnson et al., 2015). Moreover, prisoners often have their labor exploited by corporations, receiving very little in terms of remuneration (Hammad, 2019). Thus, the tough on crime laws, such as mandatory minimum sentencing, perpetuate a prison industrial complex while doing nothing to resolve the cultural, social, and economic issues that lead to crime. In fact, Peters et al. (2015) argue that many of those affected by mandatory minimum sentencing laws actually represent mental health issues rather than criminal issues, and in these cases mandatory minimum sentencing is merely a punitive form of justice that shows no care or concern for the offender as a human being. What the research shows is that rather than mandatory minimum sentencing, the criminal justice system should be looking at alternative sentencing and other ways to help individuals caught in a cycle of recidivism and crime.Why Reform is NeededCalls to repeal or reform mandatory minimum sentencing laws are based on the fact that incarceration rates are so high in the US compared to other countries, that alternative sentencing appears to be a solution to the problem of cost and recidivism, and that mental health issues are not treated adequately in the prison system. In punitive justice systems, the dignity of the human person is ignored, the cost of incarceration is ignored (both to the public and to the communities that see many of their members serving minimum mandatory sentences), and viable alternatives to incarceration are ignored. Indeed, a significant percentage of drug offenders are…

Some parts of this document are missing

Click here to view full document

…may be necessary in some cases, but in other cases the possibility of alternative sentencing should also be available. Mental health services should be an option instead of incarceration in other cases. Yet because many offenders accept plea deals as a way of avoiding trial for fear of receiving a harsher sentence that the prosecution says they will risk receiving if convicted, there is never much opportunity for alternative approaches to justice to be realized. Balance is needed and a more cautionary approach to criminal justice should be adopted.ConclusionIt is impossible to generalize or universalize an approach to criminal justice that represents all the myriad issues that may arise from case to case. Justices need to have, at the very minimum, the ability to give sentencing that is appropriate to each case, and offenders need to have the opportunity to see that their trials are conducted fairly and impartially instead of fast-tracked through a system that tends toward incarceration as the de facto solution to criminal conduct. Understanding mental health issues, criminological theories, restorative justice, and alternative sentencing can help judges see beyond incarceration as a catch-all answer to crimebut in other cases, incarceration may be the deterrent that some offenders need. It is a situation that ought not be generalized…


Cite this Document

Join thousands of other students and "spark your studies."

Sign Up for FREE
Related Documents

Studyspark Study Document

Restorative Justice Evidence Evaluation Bibligoraphy

Pages: 14 (5088 words) Sources: 14 Subject: Criminal Justice Document: #99862618

Variations of the area court model, such as teen courts, medicine courts, and household physical violence courts, focus on specific concerns in order to establish even more extensive options. The underlying presumption of neighborhood courts is that neighborhoods are deeply damaged by the sentencing procedure yet are seldom spoken with and associated with judicial results. Correcting Community justice has actually been slowest to show up in the correctional industry. Maybe this

Studyspark Study Document

Mandatory Sentencing Public Policy, Crime, and Criminal

Pages: 19 (5732 words) Sources: 22 Subject: Criminal Justice Document: #16759358

Mandatory Sentencing Public policy, crime, and criminal justice Mandatory Sentencing: Case Study Critique The prime grounds of mandatory sentencing laws are utilitarian. The laws come with long prison sentences for recidivists, drug dealers and isolation of violent criminals from the community aiming at preventing them from committing additional crimes outside the prison walls. In addition, the design of mandatory sentencing aim at deterring and portraying a harsh reflection to potential offenders of the

Studyspark Study Document

Pros and Cons of Three Strikes Policy

Pages: 5 (1527 words) Subject: Criminal Justice Document: #70106877

Public Policy and Sentencing GuidelinesIn California, the sentencing guidelines for burglary and murder are set forth in the state�s Penal Code. Burglary is defined as unlawfully entering a structure with the intent to commit a crime, and murder is defined as unlawfully killing another person with malice aforethought. The sentence for burglary depends on the severity of the crime, but can range from probation to up to six years in

Studyspark Study Document

Ohio Corrections Through Just Desserts:

Pages: 11 (3349 words) Sources: 6 Subject: Criminal Justice Document: #11263849

This highlights one of the clearest philosophical drawbacks for a correctional focus which is geared toward incapacitation. Indeed, we might regard this as an example where 'just desserts' might be an approach affiliated with the overlooked demands of Pittman's case. Particularly, we can see by the language which was used to convict him, the Pittman's case incited an interest in incapacitation based on the sense that his crimes presented a

Studyspark Study Document

Why Prison Incarceration Rates Are High

Pages: 9 (2612 words) Sources: 8 Subject: Criminal Justice Document: #23024222

The High Incarceration Rate: A Significant Issue Faced by the Criminal Justice System
Abstract
This paper examines the problem of the high rate of incarceration in America. This is a major challenge for the criminal justice system, as many people, families and communities suffer as a result of this high rate. It prevents individuals from improving their lives and can lead to the deterioration of families and neighborhoods. The paper

Join thousands of other students and

"spark your studies".