Study Document
Pages:4 (1163 words)
Document Type:Essay
Document:#87889512
Securing Dan PatanIntroductionWhen applied correctly, mission command can provide a high degree of flexibility and creativity in the execution of military operations. When applied incorrectly, however, it can lead to confusion and chaos. Accordingly, it is important for commanders to carefully consider when and how to apply the seven principles of mission command in order to achieve the desired effect on the battlefield. The seven principles are: Competence, Mutual trust, Shared understanding, Commander\'s intent, Mission orders, Disciplined initiative and Risk acceptance. This paper will analyze and evaluate each principle with regard to Gaitleys (n.d.) Securing Dan Patan. In Securing Dan Patan: A US Infantry Squad\'s Counterinsurgency Program in an Afghan Village, Scott J. Gaitley provides an in-depth look at the US militarys efforts to secure the village of Dan Patan against Taliban insurgents. He focuses on the role of a small infantry squad in carrying out a counterinsurgency program that includes building rapport between American soldiers and their ALP counterparts. In short, Gaitley (n.d.) shows how US forces demonstrated the principles of mission command in securing Dan Patan from the threat posed by enemy insurgents. This paper will thus show that adhering to these seven principles is essential for any leader who wishes to be successful in mission command.CompetenceCompetence refers to the ability of leaders to make sound decisions and carry out their orders effectively. Leaders must be knowledgeable and have the experience necessary to make informed decisions (Townsend et al., 2019). The US infantry squad demonstrated competence in securing Dan Patan village from insurgents by first identifying and then eliminating all threats in the area. One of the big threats, as Gaitley (n.d.) points out, was the lack of rapport among US soldiers and their Afghani counterparts in the fight against the Taliban. Being able to identify that threat and neutralize served as a major step forward in the mission.Mutual TrustMutual trust is essential among leaders and subordinates in order to maintain effective communication and successful operations (Mission Command, 2019). As Gaitley (n.d.) notes, building relationships of rapport and trust with the Afghans was crucial for a successful shape phase and the final transformation to the transition phase with the VSO/ALP program (p. 141). One way the US squad built rapport was through taking measures to protect the villagers from potential harm, including providing them with medical…
…accept risks in order to achieve success. US infantry squad demonstrated risk acceptance in securing Dan Patan from insurgents by accepting the risk of interacting with and helping Afghan villagers. The soldiers knew that there was a risk that they could be killed or wounded or betrayed by villagers, but they decided that it was worth it in order to complete their mission and that risk could be minimized by showing good will to the villagers and establishing rapport (Gaitley, n.d.).Risk is an inherent part of any mission. The key is to identify and assess the risks involved, and then to decide whether the potential rewards are worth the risk. Sometimes, the risks are simply too high and the mission must be aborted. Other times, the risks may be acceptable if they are offset by other factors, such as a well-developed plan or a high degree of training. In any case, accepting reasonable risk is essential to carrying out a successful mission. Without risk, there can be no reward. This mindset was evident in the US squads approach to working with the Afghan villagers and weighing the risk/reward scenario in winning the Afghan villagers over…
Study Document
ILE L100 I was pretty enthusiastic when I returned to the 56th ABCT having been ordered to assume responsibility as the deputy brigade commander (DCO). I felt proud and lucky. I had held the proud and shinny image of the 56th ABCT in my head for the last two years. When I returned, there had been some significant changes. It has not been long since I returned, and with the division
Study Document
JOINT INTEROPERABILITY CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW I. Seeking to Define and Understand Joint Interoperability There has historically been a challenge in attempting to properly understand in complexity in defining joint interoperability. This is related in the work of Faughn (2002) entitled: "Interoperability: Is it Achievable?" published by the Center for Information Policy Research at Harvard University. It is stated by Faughn that: "...the "shortfalls in operability among U.S. forces, first publicized by the press
Study Document
This gave NATO the pretext to engage in the Yugoslav conflicts, but it did not do so until 1995. In the intervening years, NATO used primarily diplomatic means of dealing with the situation. The organization at this point was assisting the United Nations, and eventually took at the role of enforcing sanctions against the combatants. During this time, the conflict continued unabated, as the sanctions had only nominal impact.
Study Document
Project Management Key Success Factors (KSFs) of most organizations have similar attributes, references, and disciplines. This is because each project has internal and external expectations. In most cases, internal expectations happen to be project developers while the external expectation happens to be clients and/or the audience community. The positive striking balance is categorical in elaborating the nature and quality expected in developing each project. This comparison will be substantial in
Study Document
20th century has been one of remarkable technological advancements and of increased need to further improve human existence and the speed through which man runs about its everyday life. These ideas alone have demonstrated an immense capacity of man to research and invent new ideas, mechanisms, and to elaborate on the most important technological evolutions to set these mechanisms in motion. However, these evolutions have not been without flaws
Study Document
Brigade The 56th Heavy Brigade Combat Team is suffering from a shortage of effective leadership, a factor that appears to be impacting nearly every functional aspect of the brigade. Hard-wired coordination has given way to fractured, piece-meal functioning that is particularly in evidence within and across S1, S3, and S4. Several variables appear to be associated with the diminished leadership, including the following issues that I observed or noted during