Studyspark Study Document

Consultative Assembly of Saudi Arabia Research Paper

Pages:7 (1876 words)

Sources:8

Subject:Countries

Topic:Saudi Arabia

Document Type:Research Paper

Document:#99722981


The Majlis al-Shura is appointed every four years while the Majlis al-Ummah members are elected every four years. The Majlis al-Shura serves in a monarch while the Majlis al-Ummah serves in a democracy. The running of Majlis al-Shura requires expertise in various fields.The council members are therefore some of the most educated people in the country. On the contrary, Majlis al-Ummah deals with issues that are mubar and do not necessarily need experts to make conclusions. These decisions by the Majlis al-Ummah are referred to as 'mashura'.The opinion of the majority are taken as the binding opinion since mubah issue have no wrong or rights. The other difference that exits between Majlis al-Shura and Majlis al-Ummah is that Majlis al-Shura has more members (150 members) when compared to Majlis al-Ummah (60 members). Majlis al-Shura also appears to be more of a political council that is mandated to run the country's technical committees while Majlis al-Ummah is more of a religious council which advices the leadership on the desires of the people in relation to the religious guidelines. It however has political factions within it.

Conclusion

It is therefore important for the leadership of the Arab countries to pay close attention to the voice of their citizens and allow for democracy and equality in order to prevent future chaos and revolutions such as the ones that dominated the popular uprisings of 2011 some of which are still happening in 2012.

References

Baaklini, AI.,Denoeux, G .,Springborg R (1999)Legislative politics in the Arab world: the resurgence of democratic institutions. Lynne Rienner Publishers

British Broadcasting Corporation (2011).Women in Saudi Arabia to vote and run in elections

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-15052030

Heydemann, S (2006).In the Shadow of Democracy: Review Article. Middle East Journal. 60 (1) Winter, 2006.).The Council of Ummah (Majlis ul-Ummah)

http://www.khilafah.com/index.php/the-khilafah/structure/338-council-of-the-ummah-majlis-ul-ummah

Oman daily Observer (2011). Saudis vote in municipal elections, results on Sunday

http://main.omanobserver.om/node/66706

Richard (2011). Ruling System of Islam Majlis al-Ummah (Council of the Ummah)

http://readquranonline.blog.com/2011/04/23/ruling-system-of-islam-majlis-al-ummah-council-of-the-ummah / ut-Tahrir, H (2005)Institutions of the Khilafah State

http://www.khilafah.com/images/images/PDF/Books/Ajhizah.pdf

Wilson, Peter W. & Graham, Douglas (1994) Saudi Arabia: The Coming Storm.


Sample Source(s) Used

References

Baaklini, AI.,Denoeux, G .,Springborg R (1999)Legislative politics in the Arab world: the resurgence of democratic institutions. Lynne Rienner Publishers

British Broadcasting Corporation (2011).Women in Saudi Arabia to vote and run in elections

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-15052030

Heydemann, S (2006).In the Shadow of Democracy: Review Article. Middle East Journal. 60 (1) Winter, 2006.).The Council of Ummah (Majlis ul-Ummah)

Cite this Document

Join thousands of other students and "spark your studies."

Sign Up for FREE
Related Documents

Studyspark Study Document

Middle East Dispute Resolution Judicial

Pages: 20 (5647 words) Sources: 30 Subject: Business - Law Document: #75624209

The purpose of such bifurcation is the enabling of the parties to the arbitration to maintain control of the impact of the Shariah in the law that they choose for arbitration. Middle East states that have not removed religion from their rules of arbitration will continue to administer arbitrations through strictly adhering with the principles of Shariah law and it is likely that these states will place a prohibition

Join thousands of other students and

"spark your studies".