Study Document
Pages:1 (387 words)
Sources:3
Document Type:Essay
Document:#44815120
Compare and Contrast Servant Leadership and FollowershipFollowership and servant leadership are two philosophies that are used by leaders of today when working with soldiers on a day-to-day basis. Leaders can\'t work alone, and it is for this reason that they need the assistance and help of the soldiers who are under them. In both of these roles, there has to be mutual respect and patience, selflessness and versatility, and awareness of oneself and those around.A servant leader thrives upon the idea of having to gather ideas from others during the decision making process (McAuley, 2016). Servant leadership is grounded upon the army ethics and values that allow for the development of soldiers. A servant leader provides inspirational motivation to the juniors by how they perform their tasks and this serves as an example to them (Harber & McMaster, 2018). Servant leadership is not focused on individual benefits but rather on the benefits of the whole group. Servant leadership personifies values like honesty, humility, and integrity.Followership is defined as reaching a particular goal while exercising respect for authority, having a positive attitude, self-discipline, and integrity (Adair et al., 2016). The first characteristic that is connected to followership is trust. A leader should ensure that they act in a manner that is transparent and worthy of trust at all times. The actions of the leader should be deemed as respectful and professional. The second characteristic is strong serving his or her organization. Followership pushes for one to recognize his or her strengths and how these strengths can influence those who they work with. The last characteristic is taking responsibility for ones actions.In conclusion, followership and servant leadership are both similar in that they require a leader to have good morals, trust, serve others, and act professionally. The differences between the two are that servant leadership brings others to the decision-making table. Followers only offer help when needed.ReferencesAdair, R., Agarwala, T., Armstead, S., Berg, P., Bisschoff, T., Blair, B. A., . . . Francis, A. (2016). Followership in Action.Harber, G. G., & McMaster, C. C. (2018). ? Adapting Servant Leadership to Follower Maturity: A Dynamic Leadership Approach for a Diverse Environment. Servant Leadership: Theory & Practice, 5(1), 5.McAuley, C. D. (2016). Servant leadership, exemplary followership, and organizational trust: A quantitative correlational study in performing arts organizations. University of Phoenix.
Study Document
Outline
I. Introduction with thesis statement: Servant leaders and their followers are two sides of the same coin, as both followership and servant leadership require a dedication to shared values and goals.
II. Topic 1 sentence: Unlike the concept of followership, servant leadership is ultimately about making strong decisions with vision and foresight.
Subtopic 1: Within the framework of servant leadership, followers offer input and feedback but are not responsible
Study Document
Leadership philosophy denotes the values, beliefs, and principles that define or influence how a leader leads their followers. There are many different leadership philosophies, but one philosophy that particularly resonates with the author’s leadership philosophy is servant leadership. Servant leadership is about serving others and prioritising the needs of others. As demonstrated in this paper, servant leadership is a leadership philosophy that is applicable at the workplace as well as
Study Document
Introduction Have you heard about servant leadership in the army? What about followership in the army? Have you been asked to write an essay about these topics? Many students in the military will be asked to write about leadership. This article will show you how to write an essay about a specific topic of leadership as it pertains to the army or the military more generally. For one, this article shows you
Study Document
The subject is on Army Followership and Servant Leadership. Compare and Contrast, and how they both apply to the Army.The military is one of the most important institutions that rely heavily on strong leadership characteristics. Here, coordination, discipline, and respect for authority all allow the military to not only achieve their desired goals, but to do so as efficiently as possible. The military requires strong leadership as failure to do
Study Document
Leadership, according to La Monica (1938), is when a person has authority that is recognized by others, and the person has followers/subordinates under them, who believe that the person will assist them in attaining certain goals (carrying out specific objectives for the followers). Furthermore, anyone that is willing to assist and help others could be referred to as a leader (p.8) Leaders see what others do not Most leaders have
Study Document
Part 1
History of Modern Leadership Studies Since 1900
The evolution of modern leadership studies begins with the Great Man Theory, which originated in the 19th century and carried over into the 20th century. It came about as people looked at the world’s greatest leaders who stood out from the run of the mill individuals of their time and made a significant difference upon the course of human history. Individuals