Study Document
Pages:3 (1009 words)
Sources:1
Subject:Theories
Topic:Utility Maximization
Document Type:Essay
Document:#25318275
Is the Theory of Utility Maximization Reliable for Rational Consumers to Make Decisions?
The article by Rothman about Johnson’s book focuses on the topic of how most people use “bounded rationality” to make their decisions—that is, they do not use a true scientific process when deciding what to do with their lives. Rather they make choices based on constrained circumstances: they do not push the parameters of their knowledge or seek out all options and explore all possibilities, weighing pros and cons with statistical rigor. The reason is that most people prefer to follow whatever impulse feels right after a cursory examination of the situation, without expending a great deal of energy on the matter. They may spend two weeks deciding what type of laptop or car to buy, but that is because the specs have already been quantified for them: they only need to compare the numbers and the advantages or disadvantages. When it comes to their own lives, they do not know how to quantify the pros or cons of this or that decision. Thus, it is much more difficult to apply the theory of utility maximization, which stipulates that people spend their money trying to maximize the value of every dollar they spend. The reality is that many people do not do this at all. Many consumers are impulse buyers when all is said and done: the entire sales industry is based on the assumption that consumers are moved more by impulse than by well-reasoned argument or scientific approach to decision-making.
Johnson argues that a decision is a value-maximizing equation—but this is not necessarily true for everyone. Many are the people who never learn math and never want to learn it. The same goes for decision-making. They are quite content to make decisions based on intuition, gut, cursory examinations and impulse. There is a thrill in consumption that is akin to going to the race track. It is like briefly reading the horses’ names and then placing…
…weighed the pros and cons and found the wars to be far too costly and not in America’s best interest. He says the soldiers could be better put to use on our own borders: why are they guarding Syria’s or worrying about protecting the Kurds? If they are going to be used, let them be used to protect Americans. His decision is based on the argument that too much money is being spent in the Middle East and there is no return on this investment. Thus, his decision is rational and based on value maximization theory.
Should the argument developed in the Rothman article cause us to reject standard microeconomic theories about consumer behaviour? Not at all. Just as no two people are the same, no one theory can perfectly explain the behavior of people. Multiple theories should always be considered when attempting to explain consumer behavior. Using only one is like putting blinders on and blocking out what is to one’s left or right, seeing…
Works Cited
Rothman, Joshua. “The Art of Decision Making.” The New Yorker, 2019.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/01/21/the-art-of-decision-making
Study Document
They presented the idea that "business firms maximize profit as a means to maximize the utility of their owners. In a word: businessmen maximize profit as a means to maximizing utility, so profit maximization follows from utility maximization" (Ormazabal). One may observe that this approach is quite similar to that of the new institutionalists a few decades ago, mentioned above. This approach considers that profit maximization does not seem
Study Document
The red line denotes marginal cost and this also increases as the production increases. The shaded region is the profits of the firm. The price line is also the marginal revenue and the average revenue for the firm. So, the company earns profit only when marginal cost is less than the marginal revenue (the area denoted by the shaded portion). When marginal cost increases more than the marginal revenue,
Study Document
Theory & Context: Institutional Choice and Public Administration This brief study examines the writing of individuals such as Meier and Krause (nd), Meier (nd), Moe (2011) and others for the purpose of constructing knowledge of the theoretical framework and context of institutional choice and public administration. The normative theory is examined and how that theoretical bases can be viewed to run throughout the fabric of the various theories and models used
Study Document
Economic Concepts Purchase of any item may be an ordinary activity for most people, but in economic terms, it is probably one of the most significant activities that govern and shape the business cycle and affects the economic conditions of any organization or country. Purchasing is directly connected with the concept of consumption. The more a person purchases, the higher is the rate of consumption and vice versa. But purchasing or
Study Document
The absence of a dominant strategy allows for the existence of a point where each player takes up a strategy that maximizes his or her outcome given the other player's options. This is what is known as the Nash equilibrium. At this point, the players take up their own individual choices and cannot improve their outcome given that the prevailing circumstances. Satisfaction of the Nash equilibrium follows from rational
Study Document
The Foundations and Implications of Marginal Utility Theory: This essay would explore the basic principles of marginal utility theory, including the law of diminishing marginal utility. It would examine the historical context of its development by economists such as William Stanley Jevons and Carl Menger. The essay would also analyze how marginal utility provides the groundwork for understanding consumer choice and the allocation of resources in market economies. Comparative Study