Studyspark Study Document

Iraq War Case Study

Related Topics: Military War Saudi Arabia Iraq

Pages:7 (2067 words)

Sources:6

Subject:Government

Topic:Desert Storm

Document Type:Case Study

Document:#65620193


Question 1

A military end state refers to a number of vivid signs that signify all military goals have been accomplished. These signs are part of the standards used to indicate the end of a given military operation. They actually point out that the military is no longer the main device in the government’s hand in accomplishing further goals. As such, it is important for the military end state to be definite and straightforward. A number of easily determinable signs should be provided. The military should also be able to come to these signs in the course of its operations. With a distinct military end state, the key stakeholders are able to set major goals which can be mutually worked on. The stakeholders are also in a better position to plan similar operations in the future (Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2017).

In this case study, the military end state was signified by the total surrender of the Iraqi forces, wherein they called back all their soldiers from Kuwait. Having done this, the government was in a good position to strategize the next course of action. Additionally, the US government added some simple goals which had to be accomplished before the military end state was officially declared. Such included the reestablishment of local security and granting locals unpaid-for access to energy reserves. There was however some bone of contention between the military end state and the officials of Desert Storm. This surprisingly made the achievement of the laid out goals much easier and acted as a reference point for post-war goals. The logical goal of giving back Kuwait its independence and political stability resulted into a distinct military end state when Iraqi forces withdrew from Kuwait and the Republican Guard was destroyed. After these events, new national goals were set to facilitate the changeover from a militaristic state to a diplomatic state (Hardy, McIntyre III & Knight, 2009).

Question 2

An array of difficulties made it hard for the Schwarzkopf and Coalition forces to defeat the Iraqi army. To single out such difficulties, it is important to take into account important instructions, the status of the prevailing operating environment and the status of a perceived ideal environment. The differences between these factors point out the difficulties that must be faced. Not many people were happy with the manner in which Schwarzkopf brought the war to an end. Some blame him for not being mindful of the Republican Guard divisions. They claim it would have been better to bring the war to an end before the Guard divisions were marooned and unable to fight (Hardy, McIntyre III & Knight, 2009).

There is a possibility that the marines moved to the right at such a high speed that Schwarzkopf could not manage them. This led to the total destruction of the Republican Guard. This destruction was also facilitated by the fact that the Republican Guard offered little very resistance. Schwarzkopf did not really know how to bring the war to an end. The US leaders had simply set their goals, but it was still unclear how Schwarzkopf was expected to handle it. This is the reason why some ended up branding him as too pessimistic. In general, he was in quite a difficult place to make the right decision (Hardy, McIntyre III & Knight, 2009).

In a bid to redeem time and space before enough soldiers were brought to the battlefield, the government decided to send a few soldiers with anti-tank weapons to try and combat the Iraqi forces. The few soldiers were requested to safeguard the important ports and smartly attack the Iraqis until they received more reinforcement (Hardy, McIntyre III & Knight, 2009).

Question 3

The Republican Guard Force Command (RGFC) was wrongly labeled as the Centre of Gravit (COG) for Iraq. The RGFC was made up of the most devoted and best-armed soldiers. However, its combat power was an equivalent of only 20%. They had been subjected to…

Some parts of this document are missing

Click here to view full document

…2009).

The initial phase of Operation Desert Storm was characterized by a massive show of airpower. Airborne weapons would attack from the land as wells as the sea. The soldiers on land also invaded the Iraqi air defense forces and destroyed their radars. This was meant to give the coalition forces complete control of the Iraqi air and make it impossible for the Iraqi forces to carry out their operations (Hardy, McIntyre III & Knight, 2009).

As the Coalition air forces were striking the Iraqi forces from all corners, the land soldiers were employing guerilla tactics to secretly ambush the Iraqis. For instance, two divisions positioned themselves to attack the weak western arm of the Iraqi forces. Meanwhile, the coalition forces made a threat to invade from the eastern side. The Iraqis, therefore, moved in big numbers to the east, unaware of the impending attack on the west (Hardy, McIntyre III & Knight, 2009).

Question 6

Desert Storm operation was largely successful because of the elaborate planning by the coalition forces. In addition to the aforementioned tactics, they also made good use of effects and a concealed approach plan. These can be seen in the fake threats to attack from the sea while the actual attack was on land. Effects in this context refer to the requirements that need to be fulfilled in order to accomplish certain goals. Saddam took the threats of sea attack quite seriously. The Iraqi forces ended up greatly scattered to such extent that it was easy to overpower them (Hardy, McIntyre III & Knight, 2009).

The indirect approach strategy is very handy to a force that is not overly superior to the enemy. As such, the aim is to invade the weak sections of the forces after they are scattered. Once the coalition forces threatened to attack from the sea, the commanders of the Iraqi forces faced hard decisions to make. They decided to send a considerable number of soldiers to safeguard the sea. This…


Sample Source(s) Used

References

Andrews, W. F. (1998). Airpower against an Army: Challenge and Response in CENTAF's Duel with the Republican Guard. DIANE Publishing.

Bame, D. J. (2001). The Exit Strategy Myth and the End State Reality. Marine Corps Command and Staff College. Quantico VA.

Builder, C. H., Bankes, S. C., & Nordin, R. (1999). Command concepts: A theory derived from the practice of command and control. RAND NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INST SANTA MONICA CA.

Currie Jr, J. G. (1995). Operational Logistics, War and Operations Other Than War: What Applies?. Army Command and General Staff College. Fort Leavenworth Ks. School of Advanced Military Studies.

Joint Chiefs of Staff (2017). Joint Publication 5-0: Joint Planning. Washigton, DC, Aug.

Matsunaga, H. (2019). The Reconstruction of Iraq after 2003: Learning from Its Successes and Failures.

Cite this Document

Join thousands of other students and "spark your studies."

Sign Up for FREE
Related Documents

Studyspark Study Document

Iraq War John Keegan Tackles

Pages: 4 (1226 words) Sources: 1 Subject: Drama - World Document: #52843210

His treatment of civilian casualties is caustically glib, and his support of the war is spurious and irresponsible. His insensitivity is most apparent when he claims of the war, "the people who ought to have been most affected by it, the population of Iraq itself, seemed scarcely to give it their attention," (p. 4). Keegan takes enormous liberties to make such a ludicrous assertion and without any proof. The

Studyspark Study Document

Iraq War & Weapon Technology

Pages: 2 (638 words) Sources: 1+ Subject: Terrorism Document: #27889419

The primary targets of the war are still at large, rendering all use of American and British weapon technology useless and in fact, more damaging to Iraqi civil society. Indeed, weapon technologies are only as effective as the people who manage and use them. The American military, despite its sophisticated weapons, failed to capture Al-Qaeda because their weapons were not used strategically -- that is, weapons only become effective when

Studyspark Study Document

Iraq War President George W.

Pages: 5 (1754 words) Sources: 1+ Subject: Terrorism Document: #83384447

" (Campo, PAGE) Such statements remind historians of colonialism, where invaders believed that their society was superior to the culture they were supplanting, while reaping significant financial rewards for doing so. However, the United States has never claimed financial gain. The real criticism of this war is the rush to get there. The United States planned to solve the Iraqi war with force of arms even while the U.N. was

Studyspark Study Document

Iraq War-Justification So Much Has Already Been

Pages: 5 (1464 words) Sources: 1+ Subject: Military Document: #78899782

Iraq War-Justification So much has already been said about Iraq War and the grave error that United States made by invading Iraq that it seems absurd to even suggest that this war was justified. But we must not ignore both sides of the coin. We have already discussed the anti-war arguments and have come to believe that serious judgment errors were made when United States, Britain and Australia agreed to launch

Studyspark Study Document

Iraq War When I Examine

Pages: 3 (888 words) Sources: 1 Subject: Terrorism Document: #69168337

What makes me cringe even more is the continued claim that we are "liberators (Byrd, 2003)." The facts don't seem to support the label we have so euphemistically attached to ourselves (Byrd, 2003). True, we have unseated a brutal, despicable despot, but "liberation" implies the follow up of freedom, self-determination and a better life for the common people (Byrd, 2003). In fact, if the situation in Iraq is the result

Studyspark Study Document

Iraq War Since the Attacks on the

Pages: 1 (406 words) Subject: History - Israel Document: #32066462

Iraq War Since the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, the Bush Administration was determined to invade Iraq. Although no weapons of mass destruction were found, the Bush administration maintained that Iraq was an active threat to the peace and security of the United States and its citizens and so felt the need to invade Iraq. The United Nations refused its support for the war on Iraq

Join thousands of other students and

"spark your studies".